Sorry for barging into someone else's letter...
A quick question: We all seem to be fixated on "excess
energy". What if one of the many innovative (or potentially
innovative) ideas were to result in an engine (a fairly simple
engine) of some sort that ***didn't*** produce excess energy, but did
have an overall efficiency of, say, three times that of the most
efficient internal combustion engine? Wouldn't that be worth
pursuing from a practical standpoint?
P.
At 12:36 AM 3/4/2007, you wrote:
Paul Lowrance posted;
>Please let me know if you ever want to debate the idea that your
passive aggressive >ways of life is better than my direct ways of life.
Correct me if I'm wrong Paul, but you seem to believe that it is
possible to reverse the 2nd Law with an electromagnetic machine.
Nobody would be happier than me if yo were to demonstrate such a
dingus. OTOH, many people have claimed to have done so, but AFAIK,
no one has. You may have noticed my criticisms of several characters
who have made their appearance on the FE stage. They include; The
Russian Science Fiction Author, Alexander Frolov, The Vaporware
Merchant, Peter Linderman, The Inventor Joseph Newman, The Doctor
Tom Bearden. These people have been selling their "information" for
years, but AFAIK, they have yet to demonstrate a working machine.
These people are particularly aggravating to me because they are
IMHO, selling trash. This critique does not apply to Chukanov, any
researcher into controlled fission or fusion, and Mills, who seems
to be producing excess energy, and whose explanations have a basis
in sensible physical theory.
--- http://USFamily.Net/dialup.html - $8.25/mo! --
http://www.usfamily.net/dsl.html - $19.99/mo! ---
