It seems to me that whatever the causes of GW, if we want a remedy we will have to take care of it.
Jed mentioned orbiting parasols once, I then understood he was talking about Earth orbits so I thought the area would have to be impractically large, but he may have been thinking about Sun orbits which could lower area requirements dramatically. But then some propulsion means would be required to make up for the difference between solar gravity and centrifugal force at that distance and speed (the smaller the orbit, the smaller the natural orbiting period, so the parasol wouldn't stay naturally aligned with the sun). I am wondering if a flotilla of solar sails couldn't be made to orbit the sun at some point of the Sun-Earth line, with their mostly sun-oriented reflecting surface acting both as a propulsion means, and as a parasol. Does anybody know at which point of the Sun-Earth line a unit parasol area would be most efficient? Michel ----- Original Message ----- From: "thomas malloy" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <vortex-l@eskimo.com> Sent: Friday, April 20, 2007 8:14 AM Subject: Re: [VO]:Global warning caused by humanity-- now factually based. > Paul Lowrance wrote: > >> I'm surprised nobody at Vo picked up on climate scientist Brenda >> Ekwurzel, PhD. guest on Coast To Coast AM show last Saturday -- > > One sided propaganda, she was too busy beating the drum on human caused > warming to talk about anything else. She ignored the issue of the Sun's > increased irradiance. Also the observation that temperature increases, > then atmospheric CO2 increases. Art Bell, true believer that he is, ate > it all up. > > OTOH, C to C AM has Richard Hoagland as a guest. he makes the case that > the increased irradiance and volcanic activity are both related to > changes in something, the Aether perhaps? www.enterprisemission.com has > quite a section on hyperdimensional physics. > > > --- http://USFamily.Net/dialup.html - $8.25/mo! -- > http://www.usfamily.net/dsl.html - $19.99/mo! --- >
