> Then there's the small matter of two Canadian > scientists who utterly refuted the thinking/ > mathematics behind the so-called "hockey stick" > graph that showed how much we puny humans have > influenced climate since the Industrial Revolution. > These chaps have been all but totally ignored, but > it's difficult to find a more elegant way of showing > just how much emotional nonsense is being spouted by > the likes of Gore so that he (and many others) can > make a killing. > > The "insufferable arrogance" spoken of by others here, > is that we puny humans can influence natural solar > cycles, which like the above scientists, have been > largely ignored in the "discussion" on global warming. > Like I said before, lets get out the fire hoses; perhaps > do a sun dance. Perhaps even try some solid science. > > P. >
Certain facts can be perceived as inconvenient. As such, there is the real danger of succumbing to the convenience of proclaiming that God and/or the mysterious forces of Nature must actually be responsible for the recorded GW data since we, ourselves, must be so puny and insignificant in comparison. After all, how can puny and significant ants be held responsible for ANYTHING so heinous as GW. "I'm harmless." - To paraphrase a claim Rush Limbaugh once used in his own defense. Regards, Steven Vincent Johnson www.OrionWorks.com
