Richard Feynman discouraged persuit of ambient heat
revival with his analysis of the ratchet wheel. I have no
clue as to the development of zero point energy.
Aloha,
Charlie
Reference: Mon, 18 Jun 2007 09:35:21 -0800
Horace Heffner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Jun 18, 2007, at 8:34 AM, Charles M. Brown wrote:
Wind, biomass burning / biodiesel / alcohol,
Photovoltaic, Hydro,
and zero point energy are heard about a lot more than
ambient heat
revival. I am looking for people who think that ambient
heat
revival is worth pursuit. Maxwell may have done it if he
had
today's nanofabrication. Maxwell may have upgraded his
demon to
Smoluchowski's trapdoor if... history was different.
Let's
theorize, computer model, prototype, prepare a network
of
development plans, and exchange money / other resources
within reason.
Exchange money?
It seems so limiting. Richard Feynman and John Wheeler
calculated there is enough energy available from the
vacuum fluctuations in a light bulb to boil the seas.
Regards,
Horace Heffner
