Steven Vincent Johnson,
OrionWorks wrote: [snip]
Trying to convince others to "admit their errors" while in the midst of negotiating for the funds you require to pursue the necessary R&D strikes me as time consuming. It's an inefficient use of one's limited personal resources. It gives me the impression that you have a personal need to convince others of the incorrectness of their opinions, rather than simply focusing on the task at hand - proving to yourself that your theory on how to harness so-called latent power locked up in ambient energy is on the right track. Your continued efforts to convince others of the correctness of your theory (and the incorrectness of their perceptions) tends to give me the impression that deep down you might not be as convinced of the accuracy of your theory as you claim. But then it would explain why you are here talking up a storm in Vortex-l. After all, if you can convince as many others as possible that your theory is correct, well then, maybe you can convince yourself as well. Otherwise, why do you care if they disagree with your conclusions.
I believe Charles was the one seeking Angel money, definitely not I. I have stated many times I won't accept donations.
I will find the need to always probe for that someone special with a gifted mind until I am holding the "smoking gun."
I doubt Randall Mills cares all that much about what Dr. Zimmerman or Dr. Park think about his extremely audacious CQM theory. I suspect Mills has enough on his dinner plate simply managing the day-to-day affairs of Black Light Power Inc. Shouldn't you be doing the same?
I care because it is easy to destroy, as one single physicists could inflict damage on this industry if allowed. Further discussions on such a topic should be in private.
Regards, Paul Lowrance
