Great deconstruction. Harry
On 12/7/2007 2:07 PM, Stiffler Scientific wrote: > HERE IS A LINK TO THE INSIDES OF THE UNIT. > > www.stifflerscientific.com/magtool.asp > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Stiffler Scientific [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Thursday, July 12, 2007 1:22 PM > To: [email protected] > Subject: RE: [Vo]:How are they doing this > > > We have done some preliminary work on this device and will within an hour > post a link to some pictures. > > Wiki Article Won! > > It does indeed use Al and Fe on the On/Off Switch. > > The pictures are self captioned with text and I will post actual test > results as soon as the unit can be reassembled. They used brass rivets and > we do not have brass screws long enough to put the plate back on. Once its > back together the measurement protocol is set up. > > One thing, it will indeed hold 40+ lbs, but it will not pull the weight to > it. This may not be a problem. > > A :-) for the day. I called Harbor Tool when they opened this AM and wanted > to be sure the item was in stock. I gave the girl on the phone only the > first three digits of the part number and she said 'The Magnet Holder?", yes > I said. She said they had five left as there was a rush this AM. Okay > Houston, what is going on? Should I ask Harbor for a cut? > > > -----Original Message----- > From: thomas malloy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Thursday, July 12, 2007 12:15 PM > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [Vo]:How are they doing this > > > Jones Beene wrote: > >> Horace Heffner wrote: >> >>> However, there will still be losses due to core and magnet heating, >>> even if no power is drawn from the coils. Further, as soon as the >>> coils draw power, the motion of shield is retarded because the >>> energy from opening the flux hole is less. >> >> >> >> The so-called flux-gate is an old concept which has never come close >> to *replicated* OU in over 100 years of trying. There are hints and >> glimpses, but that is all. In effect, it can be analogized to a >> rotating transformer. >> >> BTW there is a technical definition for fluxgate, related to >> magnetomerty, which is slightly different than the free-energy usage. > > > I'm not clear on how the effect works, Otto Schmitt built a flux gate > magnetometer which he used to detect german submarines, and Ka Boom! > > > > --- http://USFamily.Net/dialup.html - $8.25/mo! -- > http://www.usfamily.net/dsl.html - $19.99/mo! --- >
