This is the same motor as I mentioned earlier. However, the material is a bit 
more extensive, primarily as a result of related suggestions, etc.

Our mechanical lab studied it carefully with 3 D magnetic design software and 
it appears it may work as claimed. The prototype shown is not likely to produce 
the 5 kW mentioned. The actual figure seems to be much less.

If indeed it does function, operation apparently depends on two liquids. One is 
a proprietary mix. The other appears to be Mercury.

It is hard to see anything containing a quantity of liquid Mercury making much 
of a dent in the market.

However, apparently other inventors in China are now in touch with one another 
as a result of the publicity received by the Ho prototype. Perhaps a more 
practical device will eventually emerge.

Mark
Magnetic Power Inc.



OrionWorks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On 7/25/07, Jones Beene wrote:

> Lost amidst the Steorn recriminations:
>
> http://www.panaceauniversity.org/Magnetic_Motor.pdf
>
>  From China, with love - or more self-delusion?
>
>
> Awkshully, this one makes some sense. Time will tell.
>
> It is tough for a dedicated punster not to have a go with this one. I am
> hoping that Terry does not jump-in with something like 'loose stool' wrt
>  page 24.
>

I seem to recall the Mark Goldes brought this prototype to our
attention several months ago. However, the current PDF file seems to
include additional diagrams, or perhaps my memory is playing tricks on
me.

If memory serves me the speculation was that that there may be behind
the scenes maneuvering going on in China, some of that maneuvering
having to do with valiant attempts (by the "Ho" group) to go public
so-to-speak, which what they've got - to keep the project from being
completely shut down by the administration / government, etc... I
gather the prevailing opinion is that the "Ho" device could not
possibly work, therefore it is in danger of being completely
abandoned.

At least that's my memory of the speculated events.

Regards
Steven Vincent Johnson
www.OrionWorks.com


Reply via email to