The backside de-loading scheme seems to have good rationale within the deflation fusion model. The problem is to achieve it in a practical way.

The key is establishing a back-side diffusion barrier, and using the right cross-barrier potential in order to match the de-loading and loading rates so as to sustain high hydrogen fugacity. It is also an objective to provide a high electron charge density immediately opposite the de-loading barrier. One means of increasing charge density is to increase field strength by using a high dielectric strength material opposite the barrier.

Now for a surprise. One way to achieve many of these objectives is to make the back side an anode immersed in a water. The water acts as the dielectric. The field strength across the two layer water interphase can be well over 10^6 V/m.

The anodic diffusion barrier can be deposited and even maintained/ healed by anodization. The target for hydrogen tunneling then is OH- molecules in the interphase, and any free electrons that might be ionized off them and attached to the anodized barrier.

One problem with this approach is keeping the electrons from tunneling across the backside barrier to the hydrogen instead of the hydrogen tunneling through the back side barrier to the electrons. The down side to electron tunneling through the backside barrier is (1) deflation fusion is accomplished best by simultaneous deuteron tunneling to an electron and (2) fusion on the front side of the barrier will cause disruption of the lattice, destruction of the barrier, and possible helium blockage.

Preventing the problems should be possible by energetically denying them by driving front side electrolysis at a much higher voltage once loading is complete.

Operating with a superimposed pulse, on both the front and back side potentials, to trigger hydrogen barrier tunneling, may be efficient because it gives the lattice time to diffuse replacement hydrogen, backside gas a chance to dissipate, and the interphase to recover.

Horace Heffner
http://www.mtaonline.net/~hheffner/



Reply via email to