Jones! Thank you for not saying the word or using the acronym. I do not mind someone assisting me in my rhetoric as I seem to have the same social skills as Dirac, multilingual, but lacking proficiency in both.
What I really want here is for someone to duplicate and show me as one big fool and not waste bandwidth on theory. I firmly feel theory can follow duplication. -----Original Message----- From: Jones Beene [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, August 27, 2007 1:51 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [Vo]:CREC electrolyzer update Stiffler Scientific wrote: >>From the above data it should be easy to see how battery Vc is being charged during the cell operation. ... begging the question: where you also producing H2/O2 ? The point being (for those who do not yet realize where the Stiffler/Aarons etc. line of experimentation could be eventually heading)... .... even if the H2 production is not great as an absolute value compared to the input ... if one battery can be recharged, or partially recharged, even as another is being discharged (the input), and this see-saw sequence of switching can be ongoing for an extended time period- then the results go FAR beyond desulfation, and there is net OU which can be significant. In the situation with EV Gray, there is a motor instead of electrolysis; but the underlying concept could the same: a synergy between two different systems which use positive ions. This can be termed "splitting the positive" ... or not. CAVEAT: I am not trying to put words into Dr. Stiffler's mouth and he may or may not agree with this characterization of the 'big picture' but at least his work does seem to fit into a succession of past reported anomalies, often involving lead-acid batteries, and going back to at least 1973, if not much earlier. Jones
