You think you're confused ... --- Michel Jullian wrote:
> Mmmm... are you confused or floccinaucinihilipilificating the phenomenon? Both... ;=) First. It's strange that for some reason I never get messages posted by our moderator-- and Bill's post still is not in the archives. Let me just say this for now: that the only difference between this and the similar phenomenon of the Tesla coil firing a LED is 19,999 volts ;-). The milliamp current input is about the same. mas o menos. Not trying to be funny but the two phenomena may be FAR more similar than you think... read on. As to what 'cold electricity' really is - it is hard to say until more is known, but if I had to guess now, it would seem that the LEDs are NOT being powered ONLY by the circuit (in a manner of speaking) but that they are being 'opened' or 'stimulated' by the circuit's pure potential (no measurable current there) and that the 'real power' is external to the circuit !!! Obviously that creates further identity problems, but I am leaning towards the solar neutino flux as being the 'real power' and that the LED is being stimulated to operate as a gateway for forcing electron anti-nuetrino "oscillations". That is because the bandgap of these LEDs is so close to the best estimates of the mass-energy of solar neutrinos = around 3.4 eV. More later. I am just 'sleep-writing' at 4am now. Jones How can anyone sleep when the world of physics, as we know it, may be magically changing before our eyes... or else these old eyes are changing before a static world. It's all relative... don't you know, or don't ya'?
