http://home.howstuffworks.com/photocopier1.htm
On Dec 4, 2007 9:46 AM, David Jonsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Isn't laser toner specifically chosen for having high or well known static > characteristics? What is he ability to have static electricity? Has it > anything to do about paraelectricity? > > David > > > > On Dec 4, 2007 2:35 PM, leaking pen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > same as any fine dust, rub it against itself. one of those bagless vacuums > would work perfect. i created 3 inch sparks to my legs with one of those > just using reglular house dust from the static buildup. > > > > > > > > > > > > On Dec 4, 2007 1:51 AM, David Jonsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > I thought that laser toner was dangerous chemically since they are > collected and disposed separately. i investigated and found that this was > not the case > > > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Toner > > > > > > The only health risk associated with it is due to its ability to > generate static electricity. Putting it in a vacuum cleaner can make it > catch fire. Therefore I saved a bag of waste laser toner. I wonder what kind > of apparatus I need to excite the toner to produce static electricity? Can > this list offer any advise? > > > > > > David > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > That which yields isn't always weak. > > > > -- > David Jonsson > Interactive Institute AB http://www.tii.se/ > Kista, Sweden > phone callto:+46707791731 > Contact info: http://www.tii.se/people/david
