Hah! Few people are paid to think... at least not in the way you and I define thinking. That's another story. Somebody took me to task (mildly for a change) for saying that humans are not necessarily improving... But when the word "evolution" is used, it implies that improvement is in the works. Otherwise it would be devolution.
Now as for "selective breeding" - well, I haven't bred enough (with women) to know if I was being selective (on a statistical basis)... Perhaps that's the secret. Perhaps that's all I should say... P. ----- Original Message ---- From: R.C.Macaulay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [email protected] Sent: Friday, December 14, 2007 7:59:00 AM Subject: Re: [Vo]:OT: Are humans evolving faster? OT: Are humans evolving faster? DIV { MARGIN:0px;} Howdy Philip, You are not being paid to think. <grin> Breeding shows in horses, dogs and women. Go to any dog pound, college, welfare office, local high school or ghetto. Hurricane Katrina provided an excellent example of the result of "selective breeding" strategies by thinkers. Who would have thunk it? Richard Philip wrote, >There are exquisitely beautiful cave paintings in France, dating back about 15000 years. There are even more exquisite paintings - again in caves in France - dating back 35000 years. Does this indicate that perhaps there were wonderfully cultured people over 35000 years ago, and that that culture was on a downward trend? According to PD Ouspensky - a very unusual thinker - evolution comes in cycles, not in an upwardly trending linear fashion. "Where is the evidence?" you say. Well, it took only about 3000 years to almost totally bury the pyramids... And evolution - in terms of humans improving - depends on how you measure "improving." Just a thought.
