On Jan 4, 2008, at 7:16 PM, Robin van Spaandonk wrote:
Hi,
I believe I can make a case for Mills' Hydrinos not violating
Heisenberg's
Uncertainty principle.
The latter states:
delta p_x x delta x >= h_stripe / 2
The position is actually the position on the path followed by the
particle as it
follows it's momentum vector (as indicated by the "x" subscript
attached to the
"p").
For Mills Hydrinos, that path is around the circumference, not radial.
The constraint applies in any dimension chosen.
Consider for a moment that one could roll a Hydrino across a flat
surface, such
that it left a dot on the surface once for each complete
circumference. Then "x"
would effectively extend from - infinity to + infinity, with lots
of dots.
At any given point in time, not only is the position of the
electron within a
given cycle indeterminate, but also which cycle it is in, or
looking at the line
just drawn, the electron can be anywhere on the line from -infinity
to +
infinity. In short, delta x is infinite. This means that delta p
can approach
zero, implying that the momentum can be a constant fixed value, and
thus also
the energy of the electron.
This argument remains valid for any radius, even Mills' shrunken
radii, hence
the Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle can't be used as an argument
why Mills'
Hydrinos couldn't exist.
Regards,
Robin van Spaandonk
The shrub is a plant.
Horace Heffner
http://www.mtaonline.net/~hheffner/
