--- Robin van Spaandonk wrote: > I think that should be 3500 lb/year (35000 lb/ 10 > years).
Thanks Robin... looks like another draft of that one is now on order (make it Fosters this time); and also like recession is setting-in on all fronts...
--- Robin van Spaandonk wrote: > I think that should be 3500 lb/year (35000 lb/ 10 > years).
Thanks Robin... looks like another draft of that one is now on order (make it Fosters this time); and also like recession is setting-in on all fronts...