Horace Heffner wrote on 2-17-08:

For whatever it is worth, at least the US is not the only country  
with stupid (or corrupted) energy policies.

http://www.reuters.com/article/summitNews/idUSL1589672020080115

http://www.reuters.com/article/environmentNews/idUSL1785522220080118

It's the same old story.  Wipe out the renewable industry instead of  
increasing petroleum or other taxes.  That way the eventual but  
inevitably resulting much larger increase in energy prices and energy  
shortages will look like they are caused by someone or something  
other than the politicians.  This leaves them free to enjoy oil  
company backing in the mean time.  The renewable industry wipe out is  
much more effective this way too.  Letting the industry grow and then  
shocking them into bankruptcy, instead of maintaining an even policy,  
teaches innovators and investors a powerful lesson that keeps many  
out of the energy business for years.

It is pretty easy to find fault with politicians and lobbyists,  
especially where corruption is found to be involved.  However, the  
real problem is lack of an adequately informed public, a public that  
understands what is now happening to them and who should be outraged,  
and whom politicians should respect or fear when it comes to harming  
renewable energy growth.


On Feb 17, 2008, at 8:16 AM, Jones Beene wrote:

... but still, all things considered, how much longer
can GM keep letting their "Peters" do the talking, and
make such major market miscalculations? ... all the
while driving a once-excellent and dominant company
into "early retirement" ?

Horace Heffner wrote on 2-17-08:

Say, I wonder if this is an opportunity.  When some major car  
manufacturer's stock crumbles, maybe it is possible to use the  
internet to put together a grass roots green takeover.  It might be a  
way for some folks to not only advance renewable energy and  
conservation, and force long range thinking, but to make some money  
for retirement as well.  It is primarily a matter of getting the  
right people on a board of directors.  It might be possible to get  
automotive industry employee backing as well.

A key factor in being able to accomplish this is the ability of 401K  
and IRA stockholders to have voting rights with their stock.  Isn't  
there some kind of limitation on this now?

----------------

Hi All,

As of the opening of the Iranian Oil Bourse today, selling
oil for euros, not dollars, I think the chance of an American
attack on the Iranian oil fields has never been greater.

Please see below.

Jack Smith

-----------------

http://www.business-standard.com/common/news_article.php?leftnm=lmnu9&subLeft=2&autono=312626&tab=r

NEWS ARTICLE from The Business Standard, 2-5-08,

``4th cable snaps, Qatar-UAE traffic disrupted

by Rajesh S Kurup & Leslie D'Monte / Mumbai

In less than a week's time, a fourth submarine
cable was severed in West Asia, disrupting voice and
telecommunication traffic between Qatar and the United
Arab Emirates (UAE).

Even though sources attributed the disruption on Sunday
night to power outage and not a ship's anchor that affected
the earlier two Mediterranean cables (FLAG Telecom's FLAG
Europe-Asia cable and SeaMeWe-4), thousands of bloggers
across the world are attributing this to a possible
sabotage in the Mediterranean Sea in a bid to isolate Iran.

Cutting these cables might affect Iran's ability to defend
itself since communication is of vital importance during
military action, they allege.

The fourth submarine cable was damaged between Haloul
(Qatar) and Das (the UAE). Egypt's ministry of maritime
transportation, after reviewing the satellite pictures,
said there were no ships (which led to the speculation
and allegations) near the cable channel 12 hours before
or after the damage near Alexandria, Egypt.

"...to have three undersea cables, or is it actually four
cables?, cut in the same region in just a two-day span,
strains credulity; the more so, when we look at how the
damage has played out across the region... communication
cable cutting in West Asia leaves Israel and Iraq still
connected, while completely shutting down the Iranian
internet. Funny how that works, isn't it?" asks a professor
on his site.

"Seriously, is there anyone who doesn't think this is
either a precursor to military action, or a direct attack
on Iran's about-to-launch Euro-based oil market?" asks
another blogger.

"Iran is back online, but its traffic is now passing
through the UK and the US, the latter controlling the 13
primary routers. Can you say wiretap?" queries another.

Others recall spy stories of the US Navy sending
out special operations teams to go out on submarines
and deploy undersea operations, on the seabed itself,
specifically for cutting or tapping communication cables
with special airlocks and very sophisticated equipment,
much of it thoroughly documented in Blind Man's Bluff:
The Untold Story of American Submarine Espionage by Sherry
Sontag and Christopher Drew ...''

------------------

http://www.organiser.org/dynamic/modules.php?name=Content&pa=showpage&pid=225&page=27

NEWS ARTICLE from Organiser, 2-16-08,

By Sandhya Jain, Bharat Prakashan(Delhi)

Issues: February 24, 2008

``Internet and the Iran oil bourse

The Iranian Oil Bourse [scheduled to open on 2-17-08]
will hasten the speed with which major oil countries dump
the dollar for the euro; thus hastening the collapse of
the US economy. [The Chinese and Japanese have purchased
trillions of dollars of U. S.  government bonds in order
to guarantee their ability to buy oil from Arabs who will
only accept dollars ('the petrodollar').]

It is pertinent that public opinion in America and other
western nations is still ignorant that Saddam Hussain's
decision to switch from dollars to euros for the purchase
of Iraqi oil was the principal factor behind the invasion
of Iraq.

Political observers feel the Iran government's plan to
inaugurate its Oil Bourse this month had a connection
with the sudden inexplicable cutting of several undersea
internet cables. All internet access in Iran was cut
and total internet blackout was experienced for a few
days. Indian BPOs and focus of media attention for the
slowdowns that nearly crippled the industry for almost a
week, were probably unintentional targets of what appears
to be a far deeper conspiracy.

Possibly nine cable cuts have been detected since January
23. The first report said two cables were cut off the
Egyptian Mediterranean coast, disrupting three-quarters
of the international communications between Europe and
the Middle East. These cuts were initially attributed to
hits by ships anchors. But later, the Egyptian Ministry
of Communications and Information Technology said video
footage of coastal waters in the region of the two cables
showed there was no ship traffic for 12 hours preceding
and 12 hours following the time of the cable cuts.

In view of subsequent developments, sabotage seems more
likely. A few days later, another undersea cable was
found cut in the Persian Gulf, 55 kilometers off Dubai.
There followed reports of another damaged undersea cable
between Qatar and the United Arab Emirates. Soon another
report mentioned a cut undersea cable running through
the Suez to Sri Lanka. As media interest caught on, the
Khaleej Times reported on February 4, 2008 that as many
as five undersea cables were damaged, including a cable
in the Persian Gulf near Bandar Abbas, Iran; and SeaMeWe4
undersea cable near Penang, Malaysia.

There is no logical explanation for the sudden damage to
nearly nine undersea cables in the course of a week. The
known list so far includes one near Marseille, France; two
near Alexandria, Egypt; one near Dubai, Persian Gulf; one
off Bandar Abbas, Iran, Persian Gulf; one between Qatar and
the UAE, in the Persian Gulf; one in the Suez, Egypt and
one near Penang, Malaysia. The Bharti Airtel-VSNL-seven
global telecom firms' new submarine cable from India
to France via the Middle East was cut in more than one
place. In fact, the most affected region is the Middle
East, North Africa and South Asia.

It is striking that almost all these cuts have taken place
near Muslim countries, which are naturally affected. Thus
suggests the handiwork of parties capable of undersea
cable sabotage, having a pronounced anti-Muslim bias ...

This brings us back to the Oil Bourse that Iran planned to
open in February 2008 [2-17-08], for trade in `non-dollar
currencies'. Obviously, this has enormous geo-political
and economic implications for America, as hitherto the
dollar had been dominant international reserve currency
for oil transactions.

The American economic meltdown on account of sheer
fiscal indiscipline spanning decades has, however,
caused corporates, bankers, and governments to look for
alternative currencies. In the age of sovereign wealth
funds, no nation wants to buy the sharply falling dollar. A
functional Iranian Oil Bourse, selling oil tankers in
non-dollar currencies, is a terrible snub to America.

As discussed previously in these columns, members of the
Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC), namely Bahrain, Kuwait,
Qatar, Saudi Arabia and the UAE, propose to adopt a
monetary union and single currency by 2010 (like the
euro). Last May, Kuwait ended the dominance of the dollar
and adopted a basket of currencies, triggering rumours that
the UAE and Qatar would follow suit. In December 2007,
the GCC, barring Kuwait, agreed to continue to peg their
currencies to the American dollar, but experts expect this
to change as the dollar continues to slide. Certainly,
by 2010, they will go for the new GCC currency.

It is equally certain that if Iran manages to open its
own Oil Bourse, the GCC will trade there on account of
geographic proximity. This will make Iran the main hub for
oil deals in the Middle East. The three damaged undersea
cables in the Persian Gulf are an expression of anger and
frustration at the inevitability of this development. For
Iran, there is an additional message that its nuclear
programme is riling the falling superpower.

The Iranian Oil Bourse will hasten the speed with which
major oil countries dump the dollar for the euro; thus
hastening the collapse of the US economy. It is pertinent
that public opinion in America and other western nations
is still ignorant that Saddam Hussain's decision to switch
from dollars to euros for the purchase of Iraqi oil was
the principal factor behind the invasion of Iraq. This
could have encouraged other OPEC nations, besides Nigeria,
Mexico, Venezuela, to follow, and thus endangered US
economy.

Despite the invasion of Iraq and the possible threat
to Iran, the US monopoly over the oil trade is now in
peril. Hitherto, oil has been valued in dollars and
mainly traded on the New York Mercantile Exchange or
London's International Petroleum Exchange, both of which
are owned by American corporates. This monopoly compelled
national banks the world over to buy dollars, and this
compulsion allowed the US to build a debt of over eight
trillion dollars. Once the euro emerges as the principal
oil currency, the dollar will plummet in value, sinking
the American and British economies. Political observers
fear a knee-jerk reaction from Washington. ''

---------------

http://www.daniweb.com/blogs/entry2088.html

COMMENTARY by Michael Knight from Dani Web, 2-15-08

Michael_Knight's Blog

``Rumors and speculation about why five undersea cables
to the Middle East have been severed and what it means
for IT security ...

The comment storm across the blogosphere ...  has raised
awareness of several important facts: The USS Jimmy Carter,
a Seawolf-class nuclear-powered submarine, can spy on the
Internet underwater; the Pentagon considers the Internet an
enemy weapons system, and President George W. Bush signed
a secret order to expand the NSA's network-monitoring
programs just four days before the first two fibre-optic
cables were mysteriously disrupted.''

-------------

http://www.capitolhillblue.com/cont/node/4511

Article from Capitol Hill Blue, 2-10-08,

By Robert A. Kezelis

``Conspiracy theories and cut InterTube cables

Truth is stranger than fiction, reality is weirder than any
drug induced Hunter S.  Thompson fairy tale, and sometimes
obvious facts are so bad that the mind chooses to ignore
what the eyes see right front and center.

In 1985, FBI agent Robert Hanssen began spying for
the USSR, just 6 years before its collapse. One of the
secrets he sold to them was the fact that a special ops
submarine managed to tap the most important USSR military
undersea cable in existence. The sub did this not once,
but repeatedly, coming back to pick up the recorded tapes,
and to replace, even upgrade the tapping equipment.

The exact dates of tapping and the results of that spying
are murky, but by the few, reliable accounts that discussed
that op, it was incredibly successful.

In 2001, after the attack by Saudi, Yemeni and other
extremists, Iran initiated contact with the US, attempting
to coordinate and deal once and for all with the Taliban
and the hated Al Qaida. Iran had as much distaste for AQ
as the US did.

Bush, with the vainglorious advice of Dick Cheney, and
the truly inane insights of Condi Rice, rejected all
contact. Bush followed up that rejection by labeling Iran
part of the Axis of Evil.

Iran was understandably chagrined. The moderate leaders,
who had pushed for more contact and cooperation, lost
face, and worse, because of the US moves, they also lost
control, allowing the more conservative forces to extend
their power.

Iran decided to do more than simply react, they decided to
take other steps to limit the damage that America could do
to Iran. Their first step? Cutting economic ties. However,
they were not the first to try.

The man that actually did demand Euro for his oil was
Saddam Hussein in 2000. At first, his demand was met with
ridicule, later with neglect, but as it became clearer
that he meant business, political pressure was exerted
to change his mind. When other countries, like Iran,
wanted payment in other currencies, most notably Euro
and Yen, the danger to the dollar was clear and present,
and a punitive action was in order.  Bush's Shock-and-Awe
in Iraq was not about Saddam's nuclear capabilities,
about defending human rights, about spreading democracy,
or even about seizing oil fields; it was about defending
the dollar, ergo the American Empire.

http://www.energybulletin.net/12125.html

This month, Iran was supposed to open its own bourse,
trading oil and oil futures in Euros and other currencies,
but not the dollar. Delinking oil from the dollar
would protect Iran from Bush's spendthrift invasion and
occupation of Iraq, and the resulting collapse of the
US dollar.

Being a high tech project, the tubes of the internets
would play a vital role in this new market. And behold,
four major cables linking the Middle East to the rest of
the world were severed, all within one week. Some ignorant
US sources dutifully tried to blame it on "ship anchors",
but even the Egyptians refused to go along with that bogus
spin. Not only were two cables away from any shipping
lines, no ships had passed through there at the time of
the disruption.

Looking at the flotsam and jetsam that used to be the
ancient and proud country of Iraq, replaced by a Green Zone
which now sits next to the world's largest open sewer,
one might suspect that decoupling oil from the dollar
might incite a strong reaction by certain elements deep
within the US power structure.

US submarine technology has not stayed static since the
1970s. To the contrary, it has improved, along with other
military technology. As we learned last year from AT&T,
tapping every single communication within a phone company
is not all that hard, not for the NSA, CIA, and with the
tacit support of your DOJ and White House.

How much of a stretch is it to add 2+2?  Either the
Israelis or the US, severed the intertubes providing
Iran with internet access, and in the process, tapped
the lines with hi-tech links, either before or during the
repair process.

He who controls information flow, controls pretty much
everything. And if the US managed to tap into the entire
middle east's net connections with these "accidents",
well I suspect our lives have just gotten a whole lot
more complex.''

Login or register to post comments

Submitted by JeremiahJones on February 12, 2008

``It doesn't matter where the oil comes from, it's a
global commodity.  Price is determined by speculation
over the supply-demand relationship (demand being pretty
inelastic in the short run).  Rebels in Nigeria boost cash
flows to Dallas banks as East Texas crude is bid up.
(Ever wonder where the funding for these obscure,
long-running insurgencies comes from?) The oil cartels
have been playing geopolitics for over a century: A little
regime change here, a little rumble in the jungle there,
pretty soon you're talking real pricing power.''

-------------

http://www.oxan.com/worldnextweek/2008-02-14/Iranianoilbourselaunches.aspx

NEWS ARICLE from Oxford Analytica, 2-14-08,

February 16-22, 2008

``Iran launches oil bourse

The long-delayed Iranian Oil Bourse (IOB) will start
operations on Sunday [2-17-08], the official Iranian news
agency IRNA said, citing the country's oil minister.

The exchange, based on the Gulf island of Kish, a free
trade zone, opens with a whimper, rather than the promised
roar. The IOB has long been touted by Iranian news agencies
as a petrobourse for petroleum, petrochemicals and gas
in various non-dollar currencies, primarily the euro,
which would have a negative impact on the US economy and
financial system ...''


Reply via email to