On Mar 8, 2008, at 1:08 PM, Robin van Spaandonk wrote:

In reply to Robin van Spaandonk's message of Sun, 09 Mar 2008 08:52:54 +1100:
Hi,


BTW, both tori would only have a single layer.
[snip]
This is along the lines of what I am trying to get at, though I was thinking more of interactions between the individual minor axis loops of one torus with individual minor axis loops of the other (however I could easily be wrong about
that).


It was to me quite surprising the degree to which flux is fully contained by a current envelope, despite gross distortion of the toroid type current envelope that bounds the flux. For example see:

http://www.mtaonline.net/~hheffner/OddTransNotes.pdf

The fringe coupling was nominal in the Odd Transformer, despite large folds in the current envelope, and despite large peripheral winding separations. It is a critical point, and one I tried to emphasize in my prior posts, that forces on and from a major radius hoop current loop are not only created due to a major radius current from the opposed torus, but also are due to the hoop field interaction with the minor radius coils of the opposed torus (if you look at this from a Biot-Savart perspective) or at least the field generated by those coils and which is almost fully enclosed by those coils. In other words, if an independent hoop coil (coil 1) is threaded through a toroidal coil (coil 2), such that the currents through each of those coils are independently controllable, the forces generated with an independent hoop coil (coil 3) will be a function of both the currents in coil 1 and coil 2. In other words, the field of coil 2 does not have to extend beyond its envelope to interact with other coils outside that envelope, provided the fields of the other coils can overlap that of coil 2. It is merely mutually coupled fields, volume sharing fields, that provide an energy interdependence and thus forces. Since you are talking about single layer tori, they both have major axis hoop currents, and thus the confined fields of both tori are shared with, overlap, the hoop fields of the opposed tori, and thus there is a much stronger interaction than one would obtain from the major hoop currents alone. I hope this is making sense and is not just a lot of word salad. I have very little time available today to work on my wording.


Horace Heffner
http://www.mtaonline.net/~hheffner/



Reply via email to