http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a5y2dzXdGho
This is RF electrolysis - so all bets are off if you are strictly a DC kinda guy (no "lifestyle choice" innuendo intended for those of the AC/DC persuasion) RF electrolysis, unlike DC is non-Faradaic and non current(amp)denominated. It is ostensibly and metaphorically a kinetic molecular (and resonant) splitting, with the potential to be gainful, as opposed to a DC "pull" (which in never gainful). RF has been, in most of the past reports where data is actually collected, lower in output than DC, not higher. One normally expects electrolysis gas production to increase when an electrolyte is added to pure water, but when gas production goes down - this could be newsworthy. However, the electrolyte identity could be all-important in these circumstances. IOW the message here, if there is one (or two),is that RF can be as effective as DC (for those of us who believe that we have a good visual gauge for relative gas output wrt wattage) and as importantly, the experimenter may want to retain the dielectric properties of water under RF conditions, which is a factor that is contra-indicated in DC electrolysis .... or else he must choose his electrolyte from those which may also be "activated" by the frequency which is used. Jones
