Horace wrote:
> Here is a reason I think that can be expected to happen: http://mtaonline.net/~hheffner/NuclearZPEtapping.pdf Nice work as always. You probably are aware already, if you watched the Pollack video, that the same logic can apply to the partial confinement (structuring) of water. For others who have not read the paper, I will quote from the first page of the pdf, and hope that the math symbols show up. In "plain text" they will not, which is probably why HH does not paste these into his own postings (unless he has finally upgraded to an email program with a few more modern features like html ;-) ENERGY FROM UNCERTAINTY The uncertainty of momentum for a particle constrained by distance Δx is given, according to Heisenberg, by: Δmv = h/(2 π Δx) but since KE = (1/2) m v2 = (1/(2 m) ) (Δmv)2 ΔKE = (1/(2 m)) (h/(2 π Δx))2 ΔKE = h2 /((8 π2 m) (Δx)2) the more you can confine the position of a particle the more energy you can potentially observe when you sample that energy. If an electron can be confined to a 1 angstrom range then there is an uncertainty of 1.06x10-24 kg-m/s on the momentum and thus 6.1x10-19 J or 3.8 eV uncertainty on energy. END Now that is a lot of energy if this reasoning is correct, and many of us think that it is correct to a significant degree (there could be other moderating influences). In contrast, the corresponding energy available from structuring water (into 'easy-water' or EZHHO) is not this large but it is much easier to do, since the "structure" itself will "grow" over time, and it does not require exotic metals. To pretreat or structure water, in order to convert it into an energy-containing fluid, it could very well be possible that the main thing which is required is a proper container and plumbing, a supply of water and time. Possibly computerized controls would assist. The only input is either ambient heat or solare photongs. Since the "exclusion zone" the "EZ" operates to exclude particulates, the water does not even need to be pure, but if Pollack is correct, then solar activation may be needed (at least to speed up the "growth" of the aligned structure). Note the connection here to the Graneau work - where solar energy was said to be the ultimate source of gain there. CAVEAT - Graneau's work is controversial, even among former insiders - as are almost all of the anecdotes about" water-as-fuel." However, that could be because the MO was not understood, and therefore the results were not replicable on-demand. As of now, it may be prudent to operate under the premise that the mechanism for water structuring has now been explicated authroitatively, and what was not well known formerly, or at least underappreciated in its implications can now be engineered to be a reliable system for ambient energy conversion. Jones PS - As a practical matter - it would not surprise me a bit to imagine a future scenario where almost every home can be powered by activated water - EZHHO - and furthermore, that the the most notable indicia of what is going on, would be a large number of plastic drums, possibly in the garage or a shed, and with assorted plumbing. This setup would be employed to almost imperctibly process water into a structure liquid, which can give up that "energy from uncertainty" gainfully. Perhaps water is first pumped through an exterior array of roof-mounted clear plastic piping and then circulated over the proper "growth enhancing" surface. Magnetization might help. After a few days of low input processing, one would have the EZHHO for that day, which could be "burned" in a number of ways. It might take 48 hours to "grow" the water for any complete day, and at several gallons per hour consumption might be required to produce the house requirements. One way to use the structured water - is a situation where energy is added, such as in the form of electrical arcing -- and the excess energy is then expanded through a turbine (genset). A large percentage of the gain is recycled - but who cares? There is essentially no ongoing cost, as even the water can be recycled (ergo - overhead is the only cost factor). However, this might not work in Alaska in the winter <g>
