On Oct 10, 2008, at 6:29 AM, Jones Beene wrote:
Horace wrote:
Here is a reason I think that can be expected to happen:
http://mtaonline.net/~hheffner/NuclearZPEtapping.pdf
Nice work as always.
Thanks!
You probably are aware already, if you watched the Pollack video,
that the same logic can apply to the partial confinement
(structuring) of water.
Yep, I've been keenly aware of the possible importance of water
structure, especially in high electric fields, and under high
pressures. See water structure related notes in:
http://www.mtaonline.net/~hheffner/Key2Free.pdf
http://www.mtaonline.net/~hheffner/BlueAEH.pdf
http://www.mtaonline.net/~hheffner/GlowExper.pdf
Also the importance of orbital stressing by various means:
http://mtaonline.net/~hheffner/Ostressing.pdf
For others who have not read the paper, I will quote from the first
page of the pdf, and hope that the math symbols show up. In "plain
text" they will not, which is probably why HH does not paste these
into his own postings (unless he has finally upgraded to an email
program with a few more modern features like html ;-)
ENERGY FROM UNCERTAINTY
The uncertainty of momentum for a particle constrained by distance
Δx is given, according to
Heisenberg, by:
Δmv = h/(2 π Δx) but since
KE = (1/2) m v2 = (1/(2 m) ) (Δmv)2
ΔKE = (1/(2 m)) (h/(2 π Δx))2
ΔKE = h2 /((8 π2 m) (Δx)2)
the more you can confine the position of a particle the more energy
you can potentially observe when
you sample that energy. If an electron can be confined to a 1
angstrom range then there is an
uncertainty of 1.06x10-24 kg-m/s on the momentum and thus 6.1x10-19
J or 3.8 eV uncertainty on
energy. END
The superscripts don't show up properly in the above. The
predecessor paper:
http://mtaonline.net/%7Ehheffner/HeisenbergTraps.pdf
has the original formula text as posted on vorex:
"Uncertainty of momentum for a particle (electron) constrained by
distance delta x is given by:
delta mv = h/(2 Pi delta x)
but since
KE = (1/2) m v^2 = (1/(2 m) ) (delta mv)^2
delta KE = (1/(2 m)) (h/(2 Pi delta x))^2
delta KE = h^2 /((8 Pi^2 m) (delta x)^2)
the more you can confine the position of an electron the more energy
you can potentially observe
when you sample that energy. If an electron can be confined to a 1
angstrom range then there is an
uncertainty of 1.06x10^-24 kg-m/s on the momentum and thus 6.1x10^-19
J or 3.8 eV uncertainty
on energy."
"This could be an explanation in part for "heat after death", excess
heat in the Szpak cell (where
electrons are concentrated on one end of the cathode), as well as
other excess heat observations not
occurring until the gamma phase of loading. Conductivity of the
cathode is reduced in the gamma
phase of loading. The necessary condition for heat creation in Pd
type CF experiments is filling of
(and therefore eliminating) the Pd conduction bands - in addition to
basic loading. This has to
happen without cracking the lattice, which is apparently the
difficult part. When the lattice cracks
the gas in the vicinity leaks and confinement is ended. Large parts
of an electrode volume have
cracks and thus there is a steady flow of hydrogen into and out of a
cathode, which precludes
electron trapping in those volumes."
Best regards,
Horace Heffner
http://www.mtaonline.net/~hheffner/
