Jones be fair on people (as we all must be) conversions on the Road to Damascus (St Paul, sh.t not a good analogy) don't happen in infinitesimal time due to finite processes in brains.
Like I said, research, like a pop song needs a catchy hook because people won't drop everything quickly when they have vested interests and a job. You want people to stop watching pop idol and go and listen to an hour and half of avant-garde, atonal, serial music by Oliver Messian say. Most people who can hum a tune would say the notes are all wrong. The educated would say, Ah we know Dr Messian's work we've been awaiting this symphony. See what I'm getting at? Now: Preferentially hydrogen (and all the other stuff) should have dropped to the ground state long ago. So why are we all excited? (if you excuse the pun) Why isn't everything collapsing so that atoms are about 10pm in size? What's kicking us up from his sub-levels and why doesn't it then kick us higher? Why then aren't things routinely ionized? -----Original Message----- From: Jones Beene [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 30 October 2008 19:36 To: vortex-l@eskimo.com Subject: Re: [Vo]:Tata, Butanol, Biofuels ----- Original Message ---- From: Remi Cornwall > Where is the spectrographic data? He has found these lines, Remi! ....apparently you are reluctant to read his theory, but it is all in there. > Turn a 'scope at a hot nebula and Mills should get lines he predicts. Exactamundo ! where have you been? This is part and parcel of the theory and without it, few of us would be as convinced. Matter of fact, without the cosmological stuff, and before the Rowan report, I could probably agree with most of the criticism, as he has made some fairly serious math errors. These are documented on the HSG forum. They are errors, but they are not fatal to the theory, and will probably be reconciled sooner or later. Jones
