I UNSUBSCRIBE TO THIS. SCIENCE NOT SCIENCE FICTION.
-----Original Message----- From: Mike Carrell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 30 October 2008 23:56 To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [Vo]: Mills' recapitalisation of energy levels ----- Original Message ----- From: "Stephen A. Lawrence" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > Mike Carrell wrote: >> ... The "ground state" is >> simply the relaxed state in a vacuum, neither ionized nor catalyzed. >> Mills' discovery is that the fractional state can be reached by >> selective catalysis under special conditions. > > I have a Very Dumb Question here. > > Is there a simple, concise explanation of why a hydrogen atom can't > spontaneously collapse to a hydrino, by radiating away the transition > energy as a photon? That is *not* a VDQ at all. It is profound and fundamental and historic. As the 'planetary' model of the atom began to emerge in the late 1800s, it was realized that the model predicted that the electron, being accelerated [in a circular path] should radiate energy and fall into the proton. A hot black body would radiate its heat in a flash. Yet these things do not happen. The salvation was the idea that radiation could occur only at discrete frequencies, and Quantum Theory was born. The next question was what mechanism determined those discrete frequencies? Mills' answer was to conceive that the electron was a a two-dimentional, superconducting, shell of moving charge. It was like a resonator cavitywhich would support only modes with an interger relationship to size. This followed Maxwell's equations and gave a 'natural' quantization and a conceptual continuity between the atomic and macroscopic worlds. Thus Mills' claim that GUTCP is valid over 85 orders of magnitude. If accepted and tested, this is a landmark achievment in physics. I don't know why Mills selected 137 as the highest degree of shrinkage. The number 137 appears in strange places in physical theory. Hydrinos can catalyze each other, but one goes to a higher state as the other goes to a lower state. Mills has observed spectral lines associated with 11 degress of shrinkage. More may occur, but they are so rare that the radiation signature has not been detected. > I.e., why is a collision with a catalyst necessary? > > If the only simple answer is "Don't be so lazy, Read The Book", well, > whatever ... but I'm hoping it's possible for someone here to give an > approximate summary of the reason in a few sentences. Again not a VDQ, but a VGoodQ, and the heart of the BLP reactions. Consider an isolated hydrogen atom. If, say, a singly ionized argon atom comes within a certain distance of the hydrogen atom, energy is transfered without a photon being created. This transfer destabilized the hydrogen electron's orbit and it moves to an orbit closer to the proton, releasing a burst of energy as a ultraviolet photon. The hydrogen is now smaller, a "hydrino". In this state it can acquire another electron, becoming a hydride, or combine with another hydrino as a compound, or become a catalyst to another H or hydrino. The energy initially transfered is very specific, 27.2 eV. Hence it is called a "resonant transfer", abbreviated rt or RT. It is "resonant" because the energy required is specific, 27.2 eV or an integer multiple of 27.2. Ionized argon is one example. He+, Rb+, O++, K+, 2H and NaH also fufill the requirement. There are probably others. In general, Mills states that anything presenting the right energy "hole" will do. Actual "contact" is not reqluired, but the exact conditons have not been disclosed by Mills [if they are actually known to him]. This "resonant transfer" is not an invention of Mills, for it is known in other places, such as fluroescent phosphors. It is a phenomenon of nature. These reactions are demonstrated in animations to be found on the website. Hope this helps. Mike Carrell > > > ________________________________________________________________________ > This Email has been scanned for all viruses by Medford Leas I.T. > Department.
