On the 45th Anniversary of the end of Camelot... there have been strange 
revelations on the conspiracy front. Not necesarrily true, but stange. At 
least, it makes for more drama than anything James Bond can offer on a gray 
weekend, now that that the 007 franchise has apparently decided to go 
"plotless" from now on (not that I didn't like the action).

And speaking of lost paths - how long will it take for the Aquarian dream of 
the sixties - peace, love, flower power, and all that - to re-establish itself 
in this new century, or will the same forces of evil prevail? Already Obama is 
being compared to JFK.

The Dallas Police Association headquarters building is officially named "The 
George E. Butler Building" in honor of the detective who was the organized 
crime expert for the Dallas Police at the time when JFK was assassinated. 
Curiously, he was never interviewed by the Warren Commission despite his 
intimate knowledge of the situation. He was in charge of, and standing next to 
Oswald at that infamous moment his old friend and free-lap-dance supplier - 
Jack Ruby - silenced Lee Harvey for all eternity.

He had known Jack Ruby and Ruby's sister Eva Grant since 1947 - or before, and 
knew that Ruby had an illegitimate son who met with him regularly in the 
sixties. And more intriguing is that Butler has been said to have been Dorothy 
Kilgallen's  'deep throat' information source -- that is: before she too was 
murdered to further silence the conspiracy. 

The bombshell she had obtained from Butler was apparently that Jack Ruby was 
Oswald's biological father. DNA could now confirm that - if any remains from 
the two. It would be no surprise if none survived, of course.

Lee Harvey Oswald was born in 1939, in New Orleans before Ruby moved to Dallas. 
According to conventional wisdom Oswald's father died of a heart attack just 
two months before Oswald was born, leaving Oswald's mother to care for three 
young children. There is no indication that Ruby, who was itenerate at the 
time, was ever associated with Oswald's mother, except for the Butler 
revelation- so it is very easy to dismiss. 

It is almost too bizarre a detail for even Dorothy Kilgallen to have believed. 
But that knowledge may have been her death warrant - and an act which served 
double duty to silence Butler from then on.

Less easy to dismiss, was a letter from the FBI to the Dallas police chief, 
found in an old safe recently, stating that Eva Grant (Ruby's sister) had sworn 
under oath immediately after the event, that her father had inexplicably 
obtained a full detailed police report on the preparations for Kennedy's visit 
to Dallas. 

Ruby was not likely to have be on the White House or Secret Service mailing 
list, so he probably got it through his mob connections, or through Butler. Did 
Ruby setup Lee in the Book Depository, which was the 'weak link' in security 
that was obvious to anyone with the aforementioned police report ?

Should not the Warren Commission have mentioned Eva Grant's testimony in their 
report, even if it was discredited by her character as being true (she ended up 
as a prostitute)?

All of that is makes for good fact-tinged fiction - but if there is a grain of 
truth to the recurrent suggestion that there exist a cadre of 'bad apples' 
remaining at high levels of goverment - pehaps even invigorated by 8 years of 
coddling by Dick Cheney, then Obama should be especially vigilant. 

There is no assurance that even the Secret Service has not been infiltrated by 
Cheney.

Secret ServiceDirector Mark Sullivanasked congressional leaders in April to 
extend Cheney’s
security detail beyond January when the administration leaves office,
citing “the threat environment we face today,” The Washington Post
reported that Cheneywill get a $4 million Secret Servicedetail for six months 
beyond the administration’s term. This is not without precedent but scary. 

Former agency officials said the request is reasonable considering
the war in Iraq, the terrorism threat and the "unusually active role Cheney 
played in Washington". No kidding.


They did not mention any special need for Cheney to stay in touch with the same 
people who will be protecting Obama. 


Guess we have to trust out govenrment on that one, no?

Reply via email to