And true or not they should be discredited regardless of the reason for their failed replications.
On Fri, Nov 28, 2008 at 8:33 AM, John Berry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The number of failures from them had me thinking the same thing, true or > not it is a natural conclusion. > > > On Fri, Nov 28, 2008 at 3:02 AM, Terry Blanton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> This was recently (11/23/09) posted on the Hydrino group: >> >> "As I have pointed out in the past, EarthTech is not to >> be trusted. Their purpose is to pretend to fail at >> replication so as to discredit experiments that risk >> upsetting the status quo: >> http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/hydrino/message/12488 >> http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/hydrino/message/12558 >> http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/hydrino/message/13036"; >> >> While I have often suspected the same, I find it remarkable that this >> poster, who is possibly a lecturer at the University of Pittsburg (in >> the Chevron Science Center no less! :) makes such bold statements. >> >> He goes on to say that Randell Mills is wise to shun EarthTech. >> >> Terry >> >> >
