This document has some important comments by Melvin Miles who is a superb electrochemist and writes some the clearest prose around. People should pay close attention to this:

"EarthTech wanted me to supervise setting up the experiment so it would be done the same way as I had done it. The problem was that they didn't have a dry box; we didn't have anything there to keep the heavy water dry like I did at China Lake. Also, it rained all day long, and there was very high humidity. They had the heavy water samples sitting out a lot longer than I would ever have them exposed to the moist atmosphere, but we didn't have any other choice - I had to do this on a weekend, and that's the weather we ended up with."

This is a good illustration of why it is difficult to do the same experiment twice, even when you are an expert. The weather really does interfere!

Heavy water is hygroscopic and this is a BIG problem in cold fusion, often unrecognized. I do not know how you measure heavy water contamination levels . . . I guess with a precise weight scale? But anyway this will wreck a Pd-bulk experiment, sure as shootin' as Dr. S. Palin might put it.

Miles makes other important points so everyone should read his comments carefully. He makes good points in all his papers, including his most recent one in which I made a guest appearance. (Preen, preen.)

The only thing I mildly disagree with him about is the choice of calorimeter types. I prefer the Seebeck, as I said, and he likes Fleischmann's design. Of course a researcher should use whatever instrument he feels most comfortable with. He should use an instrument he is experienced with and feel confidence in, as long as it fulfills the requirements of the experiment, allowing sufficient current density, high temperature and so on. As Storms points out in this document, some calorimeter designs (including the MOAC) might have a limitation that prevents a positive result, or reduces the intensity of the reaction. This happens more often than you might think. The instrument itself is a key component in the experiment.

- Jed

Reply via email to