Hi All,         12-1-08

What are your thoughts on "The Quantum Fusion Hypothesis"
by Robert E. Godes in ISSUE 82, November/December 2008,
of "Infinite Energy"?

http://www.infinite-energy.com/

The article is not online, where all I could find is the
enclosed below.

Jack Smith

--------------

http://electronicdesign.com/Articles/Index.cfm'AD=1&ArticleID=15870

Robert Godes of http://profusionenergy.com/ wrote:

``Here is some food for thought. The DOE has established a
huge feeding trough full of Other Peoples Money, (OPM)
pronounced opium, to which they are fully addicted.
There are more promising alternative paths to hot fusion
than ITER. See work involving Boron 11 +H and there is
even more progress being made in LENR reactors.

Try as they did, they did not completely kill the misnamed
'Cold Fusion' technology. I say misnamed because the
physics underlying it is fully described in a patent
application publishing on September 6th 2007, U.S. Patent
Application No. 11/617,632.

I quit my day job in 2005 to start Profusion Energy, which
will license the IP to build and produce products that
will use what Profusion Energy calls 'Quantum Fusion'. We
already have devices; yes multiple repeatable devices,
that work reliably in an open container. We are currently
looking for someone who can work out the math involved
with the molecular Hamiltonian, for a white paper on
the subject.

We are also looking for an angel ... investor, as family
and friends ... have taken it about as far as it can be
taken in an open container. An investment of $2M will get
my team in to an adequately equipped lab and allow us to
collect hard calorimeter data on energy production in 12
to 18 months. An investment of $500K would allow me to
rent lab space and get the equipment necessary to start
collecting data by myself. At this level of funding it will
take two to three years to collect the required data.''

Robert Godes, August 30, 2007


Reply via email to