You forget Jed that WWII was not a stimulus to the rest of the world and we gained only because we sold the items that were destroyed for gold. After WWII we were the only country that could manufacture much of anything for a long time. I don't think the approach you suggest would work now.

Ed


On Feb 26, 2009, at 4:51 PM, Jed Rothwell wrote:

Rick Monteverde wrote:

I just correctly pointed out that environmental monitoring, good or otherwise, is a great example of NOT-STIMULUS . . .

This is a different issue entirely. According to Keynsians, spending money for any purpose is a stimulus. I wouldn't know about that. I know practically nothing about economics, so perhaps you are right.

But I note that spending on WWII was the largest economic stimulus in history, and every dollar of that was wasted. Deliberately wasted: it was used to drop bombs and fire off shells, and to build thousands of warships that were scrapped soon after the fighting ended.

If we are going to spend money it is better to spend it on things we need such as volcano monitoring. But based on the experience of World War II we might get an economic stimulus by absurd economic waste such as digging holes and filling them in. It worked even in the extreme case in which we dug holes and filled them in with hundreds of thousands of our dead soldiers.

- Jed


Reply via email to