>From Horace, > > The pushing of the BH curve into the interior of the PM when two like > > poles are pushed closer together is quite evident graphically speaking > > when performing FEMM simulations. I noticed this effect all the time > > in my FEMM simulations. The result invariably is that repulsive forces > > seem to be weaker > > But they aren't.
I suppose the key phrase is: "seem[s] to be weaker." I suppose it comes down to a matter of interpretation. ;-) ... > > To recap, it seems to me that Hoyt's comment easily explains the > > graphic as displayed out at: > > > > http://tinyurl.com/orcekf > > And therefore I contend that explanation is just as bogus as the > experiment itself. I would I agree in the sense that the attraction only appears to be stronger. While physical measurements would definately show stronger recorded forces in the attraction configuration, I don't believe this analysis takes into account the overall spatial analysis which I eluded to in a previous post. > > I'm sure the experiment describes an accurate observation of Mother > > Nature's forces. > > I feel fairly sure the experiment is does not prove what the author > claims. It is blatantly evident the report is shoddy or the work was > shoddy or both. Little was apparently thought through regarding > verifying the results, and little was reported. It would seem that I agree. > > Nevertheless, I'm puzzled that this particular > > experiment is making such a big deal out of the phenomenon. > > > > Please understand. I'm not claiming there IS no OU and/or asymmetry in > > certain PM configurations. > > I'm making neither ou or nor ou claims. I merely question the > experimental results and therefore also the conclusions claimed by > Kopernicky. > > I further think, since so much baloney is floating around, and so > much has been spent based on this assumption, that it is worth the > time for anyone who expects to use the principle to actually test it > throughly. > > > > I have insufficient knowledge on the matter > > to proclaim such an absurd conclusion. > > I'm happy to let Mother Nature demonstrate her own conclusions. Indeed. The trick seems to be to cather her in the act. >8-0 Regards Steven Vincent Johnson www.OrionWorks.com www.zazzle.com/orionworks
