Hoyt A. Stearns Jr. wrote: > This discussion is somewhat re-discovering or describing Dewey B. Larson's > Reciprocal System of physics, a unified theory: > > http://rstheory.org/video/rs-101 > > A motion or "space/time" unit is the fundamental "particle" of the > universe, and exists in 3D. >
A motion does necessarily needs to be described as space divided by time. I've showed that before. > Note it is not a unit moving around in "space" it IS the space and the > time --difficult to visualize, I know, but > That sounds like what I'm trying to say, but I wouldn't talk about the space and the time, but about the space and the velocity. We can think of a motion as a displacement of a discrete entity in what we may call 'empty space' (but this can probably be simplified further.) That motion has an intrinsic velocity. The most basic motion is probably a circular one, which has an intrinsic angular velocity. Those are physical realities. The rest is an abstraction, including probably the very concept of 'space' we're using as an aid here. That is, space is also an abstraction, being in reality the sub-product of (very specific) motions. > > not as hard as modern physics theories with many dimensions >3 ( which I > think are mostly bogus, BTW ). > > Hoyt Stearns > Scottsdale Arizona US > http://HoytStearns.com > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Mauro Lacy [mailto:ma...@lacy.com.ar] > Sent: Friday, May 22, 2009 8:52 PM > To: vortex-l@eskimo.com > Subject: Re: [Vo]:Zitter and ZPE > > > Jones Beene wrote: > >> ----- Original Message ---- >> >> >> >>> From: Mauro Lacy >>> >>> >> >>> Only velocity exists, physically. From then on, time is derived as t=v/s. >>> > That is, in physics time is no more than a mathematical construct. I meant: > t=s/v > >> Which comes first - the chicken or the egg? >> >> > The problem of "which comes first" is even more difficult in the > particular case of discussions about time, because the very notion of > "first" involves the notion of time, i.e. it involves a temporal sequence. > >> Why not say that only time and space exist, physically, and that velocity >> > is derived therefrom ? > > ... > > >
