Sure Steven, this could be faked all kinds of ways. This fact alone
makes the demonstration totally uninteresting and non-threatening to
the MIB. So even if the effect is real, there is no purpose for the
MIB to get involved because no one would believe the claims even if
they were true. So, obviously you are right, this is drama being
generated by Mylow to gain attention. The impression being created is
that if the MIB are involved, the claims must be real. In spite of
this distraction, the reality of the effect is still unknown.
Ed
On May 25, 2009, at 8:40 AM, OrionWorks wrote:
Ed sez:
Let me see if I understand the situation. A guy who has no scientific
background makes a disc turn with no apparent source of power. The
demonstration is close to a toy and Mylow has no ability to provide
an
explanation. The MIB try to shut him down. In contrast, competent
scientists who study CF, a much more intense source of energy, are
not
bothered at all by the MIB even though they are making progress
toward
a practical device. In fact, the work will eventually be funded by
the
government (MIB?). In the same vain, people who have magnet motors
much closer to a practical device are also not bothered by the MIB.
The MIB only pick on a poor slob whose demonstration would have
essentially no effect on the course of history even if his effect
were
real, and completely ignore real threats to the status quo. How
rational does this sound?
Ed
Heh! What does rationality got to do with this! It's all about
drama! ;-)
Let us also not lose site of the fact that Kyle Mcallister worked out
all the dirty details. Kyle presented the Vort Collective with an
amusing and informative YouTube video of how the Mylow motor could
have been perpetrated, back around May 17.
Take another look:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1Mlfsx1ZaT0&feature=channel_page
As for me... shoot! I guess I'm basically an optimist at heart. I
would prefer to conduct my life on the initial premise of not judging
people, or at least giving them the benefit of the doubt first before
automatically condemning them to the trash heap. This has obviously
not always worked out in my favor. Reagan said it best: "Trust, but
verify."
Obviously, practicing such personal philosophy runs the risk of
opening myself up to charges of being gullible. It's a risk I'm
willing to accept. I'm sure it will happen to me again. But for me,
it's the lesser of two evils. Assuming an air of intellectual
superiority - that such-n-such a device couldn't possibly work, cuz,
well... cuz we all know better and that it just kant, is not a
behavior I would care to emulate in my life. In a weird kind'a way the
latter attitude, IMO, can mask an unconscious fear of not wanting to
be labeled as behaving in a gullible fashion by one's peers. It could
blind one from ferreting out the occasional diamond in the ruff.
If I've learned anything so far it would seem that life is telling me
it would be wise to verify or disprove one's fantasies as quickly as
possible.
Regards
Steven Vincent Johnson
www.OrionWorks.com
www.zazzle.com/orionworks
