Rick Monteverde wrote: > > Jed wrote: > > >> If you would like to argue that salt or CO2 in the wrong places in the > wrong amounts are not pollutants, let's see some reasons. > > Wait a minute! > > - Anthropogenic contributions of CO2 to the atmosphere is warming earth's > climate (and we're at the "tipping point" now, etc.) If you say it's not, > show me some reasons. > > In your version of a science forum, you can just make up pure scientifical > sounding nonsense like that, perhaps justified by political reasons, then > tell us if we can't show evidence that it isn't true, we should basically > just shut up and smell the socialism? > > Ok, I'll play: > > - Invisible elves from the Crab Nebula in Orion are controlling the Federal > Reserve Bank from their base on the back side of the moon. And that explains > everything that's happened to the US economy lately, as confirmed by > numerous people who have studied these things carefully and can't possibly > be wrong. > > There it is. Hmpf. > > - Rick
Hi All, Joking aside, why is it that so many people refuse to face the fact that the main reason for our current economic problems is simple theft? The thieves managed to get the law (ant the rules) changed so that they could not be prosecuted. >From enormous wealth transfer (theft) by the Arabs and others for oil to the Great Bear Raid of 2008 (see SEC elimination of the uptick rule in 2007), we are now in the position of a company that has just suffered a massive embezzlement. It's hard to run a business without cash or credit. Fortunately the federal government can just print money, which they are not doing fast enough. On a lighter note, on the subject of "long-range" communication for cellular level diffusion, there is a fascinating article in the May/June issue (Issue 85) of Infinite Energy, starting on page 25, titled "Experimental observation and modeling of Cs-137 isotope deactivation and stable isotope transmutation in biological cells." Jack Smith
