Regardless of whether one likes or dislikes interacting with trolls,
most readers tend to understand that such behavior is likely due to a
lashing out, an acting out against unrecognized pain that resides
within the psyches of such damaged personas, a pain that has yet to be
confronted and healed. The tragedy is that such behavior is often the
psychological fallout caused by a slew of abuse most likely inflicted
during the formative childhood years. It is abuse (emotional and/or
physical) for which they had no control over, for which they did their
best to survive through.

It is conceivable (however remote it might be) that allowing such
individuals to participate within discussion groups like Vortex-l can
eventually help them come to better terms with the horrible demons
inflicted on them. Needless to say, this is a tall order, one that
many through no fault of their own are not up to the task of lending
such "assistance." I also suspect it really helps to be a reformed
troll in order to understand where all trolls are coming from.

I had my first taste dealing with the troll persona back in the mid
90s when I participated in on-line discussion board services like
Dejanews. I particularly enjoyed participating in obtuse groups like
alt.alien.visitors. I encountered numerous hard-line skeptics who
seemed to relish trashing the beliefs of the true believers. It was
within some of these groups that I recall having close encounters with
two highly vocal trolls. Over a period of time I eventually managed to
befriend one of these trolls, as the result of extended private
exchanges. These private exchanges seemed reasonably productive from
my perspective because we had managed to get to the point of being
able to lend each other advice and insight on occasion. Later when we
would once again encounter each other in the pubic arena of Dejanews I
suspect we enjoyed each other's sparring much more than had we stayed
strangers. Though we remained on opposite sides of the fence
concerning many subjects I think we had nevertheless acquired a
guarded respect for each other.

It's been my experience (and subsequent belief) that each and every
one of us is not immune from becoming a troll in our own way. We must
constantly observe our own motivations and beliefs when discussing
topics that we might feel passionate about. I know for a fact I am
considered to be a "fanatic" by certain individuals I'm acquainted
with in other discussion groups, such as when I have discussed recent
controversial Cold Fusion findings. I've found it to be a good idea to
ask myself, "Am I a fanatic?" every time someone challenges me,
particularly when I feel compelled to set the record straight. While I
endeavor to be diplomatic at all times the passion of the moment
occasionally carries through in some of my responses – often with
unpredictable results. While some readers may learn something from my
posts, something they might not have known before, I also learn
another lesson in humility about my own need to set the record
straight. After the exchanges have been lobbed and all is done, I
sometimes find myself asking: WHY do I occasionally need take on such
"crusades". Is it really for the benefit of my readers, or am I just
"acting out."

Never stop questioning.

Regards
Steven Vincent Johnson
www.OrionWorks.com
www.zazzle.com/orionworks

Reply via email to