Jed,
It could either have something to do with my communication - in my own
gentle way <g> - with the SCIAM editor. Or maybe it was the ACS, or both,
or some other unknown factor. Oransky and I never talked - but he seemed to
have gotten the message.
<http://newenergytimes.com/v2/inthenews/2009/Q1/Scientific%20American%20Before%20ACS.pdf>(Scientific
American BEFORE ACS)
<http://www.sciam.com/blog/60-second-science/post.cfm?id=five-big-alt-energy-letdowns-ideas-2009-03-18>Link
to Original
<http://newenergytimes.com/v2/inthenews/2009/Q1/Scientific%20American%20After%20ACS.pdf>Scientific
American (After ACS)
<http://www.sciam.com/blog/60-second-science/post.cfm?id=after-20-years-new-life-for-cold-fu-2009-03-23>Link
to Original
Steve
*****************
From: Steven Krivit
Date: Wed, 18 Mar 2009 20:43:48 -0800
Ivan,
I'd like to chat with you briefly about a SciAm article. Is there a number
where I may reach you?
Thanks,
Steve
*****************
At 09:25 AM 3/19/2009 -0400, [Oransky] wrote:
Hi Steve -- do you mean an item already on our site? If so, which one? Or
are you thinking about pitching us something?
Ivan Oransky
*****************
On Mar 19, 2009, at 6:18 PM, Steven Krivit wrote:
an item already on your site
*****************
At 05:22 PM 3/19/2009 -0400, [Oransky] wrote:
Feel free to leave a comment on it, in that case. Let me know which one it is.
*****************
On Mar 19, 2009, at 6:42 PM, Steven Krivit wrote:
brush-off?
*****************
At 05:39 PM 3/19/2009 -0400, [Oransky] wrote:
Trying to encourage you to engage with us as well as with our audience.
Also still not sure what item it is, and what you want to talk about.
*****************
Date: Thu, 19 Mar 2009 15:48:04 -0800
To: Ivan Oransky
From: Steven Krivit
Subject: Re: sciam article
310.721.5919
*****************
On 19 Mar 2009 18:52:37 -0400 [Oransky] wrote:
To: Steven Krivit
Sorry, need to know what this is about and what you'd like to discuss.
*****************
Date: Thu, 19 Mar 2009 17:52:32 -0800
To: Ivan Oransky
From: Steven Krivit
Subject: Re: sciam article
Ivan,
This is not a letter to the editor.
You make it very hard for someone to communicate with you like a human
being. E-mail is about the lowest form of human communication, though it is
certainly a good improvement over semaphore.
I'm not here to pitch you a story, to give you a hard time or to sell you
on anything. I am here to help you - if you want it.
If a friend of yours came out of the bathroom with his zipper undone into a
conference hall...or if a friend sneezed and unknown to him he had a bugger
hanging from his nose, you would discreetly tell him so, I presume? Thus,
the equivalent has occurred with your recent paragraph about "cold fusion"
by Katherine Harmon.
If you want to know more - then you call me up. I'm not going to waste my
time trying to have an email conversation with you or your grad school
intern who does her "journalism research" on Wikipedia.
Steve
*****************
Date: Fri, 27 Mar 2009 17:32:15 -0800
To: Ivan Oransky
From: Steven Krivit
Subject: Re: sciam article
Ivan,
I see you folks did a good quick turnaround.
[btw:] http://newenergytimes.com/v2/blog/?p=57
Let me know if I can be of further assistance.
Steve
*****************
Date: Thu, 16 Apr 2009 22:57:50 -0800
To: Ivan Oransky
From: Steve Krivit
Subject: CBS TV's "60 Minutes" Turns Up the Heat
Ivan,
Best regards,
Steve
CBS TV's "60 Minutes" Turns Up the Heat
by Steven B. Krivit
Editor, New Energy Times
April 16, 2009
http://newenergytimes.com/v2/news/2009/60MinutesTurnsUptheHeat.shtml
*****************
