Loved the "zipper undone in a conference room" analogy :))) Michel
2009/6/11 Steven Krivit <[email protected]>: > Jed, > > It could either have something to do with my communication - in my own > gentle way <g> - with the SCIAM editor. Or maybe it was the ACS, or both, or > some other unknown factor. Oransky and I never talked - but he seemed to > have gotten the message. > > (Scientific American BEFORE ACS) > Link to Original > > Scientific American (After ACS) > Link to Original > > Steve > > ***************** > > From: Steven Krivit > Date: Wed, 18 Mar 2009 20:43:48 -0800 > > Ivan, > > I'd like to chat with you briefly about a SciAm article. Is there a number > where I may reach you? > > Thanks, > > Steve > > ***************** > > At 09:25 AM 3/19/2009 -0400, [Oransky] wrote: > > Hi Steve -- do you mean an item already on our site? If so, which one? Or > are you thinking about pitching us something? > > Ivan Oransky > > ***************** > > On Mar 19, 2009, at 6:18 PM, Steven Krivit wrote: > > > an item already on your site > > > ***************** > > At 05:22 PM 3/19/2009 -0400, [Oransky] wrote: > > Feel free to leave a comment on it, in that case. Let me know which one it > is. > > ***************** > > On Mar 19, 2009, at 6:42 PM, Steven Krivit wrote: > > > brush-off? > > ***************** > > At 05:39 PM 3/19/2009 -0400, [Oransky] wrote: > > Trying to encourage you to engage with us as well as with our audience. Also > still not sure what item it is, and what you want to talk about. > > ***************** > > Date: Thu, 19 Mar 2009 15:48:04 -0800 > To: Ivan Oransky > From: Steven Krivit > Subject: Re: sciam article > > 310.721.5919 > > ***************** > > On 19 Mar 2009 18:52:37 -0400 [Oransky] wrote: > To: Steven Krivit > > Sorry, need to know what this is about and what you'd like to discuss. > > > ***************** > > Date: Thu, 19 Mar 2009 17:52:32 -0800 > To: Ivan Oransky > From: Steven Krivit > Subject: Re: sciam article > > Ivan, > > This is not a letter to the editor. > > You make it very hard for someone to communicate with you like a human > being. E-mail is about the lowest form of human communication, though it is > certainly a good improvement over semaphore. > > I'm not here to pitch you a story, to give you a hard time or to sell you on > anything. I am here to help you - if you want it. > > If a friend of yours came out of the bathroom with his zipper undone into a > conference hall...or if a friend sneezed and unknown to him he had a bugger > hanging from his nose, you would discreetly tell him so, I presume? Thus, > the equivalent has occurred with your recent paragraph about "cold fusion" > by Katherine Harmon. > > If you want to know more - then you call me up. I'm not going to waste my > time trying to have an email conversation with you or your grad school > intern who does her "journalism research" on Wikipedia. > > Steve > > ***************** > > Date: Fri, 27 Mar 2009 17:32:15 -0800 > To: Ivan Oransky > From: Steven Krivit > Subject: Re: sciam article > > Ivan, > > I see you folks did a good quick turnaround. > > [btw:] http://newenergytimes.com/v2/blog/?p=57 > > Let me know if I can be of further assistance. > > Steve > > > ***************** > > Date: Thu, 16 Apr 2009 22:57:50 -0800 > To: Ivan Oransky > From: Steve Krivit > Subject: CBS TV's "60 Minutes" Turns Up the Heat > > Ivan, > > Best regards, > > Steve > > > CBS TV's "60 Minutes" Turns Up the Heat > by Steven B. Krivit > Editor, New Energy Times > April 16, 2009 > > http://newenergytimes.com/v2/news/2009/60MinutesTurnsUptheHeat.shtml > > > ***************** > >
