that was a chemical reaction on the aluminum slurry to make hydrogen gas for running a fuel cell, i recall that one. that was making electricity though. it was storage of electricity in a chemical way.
On Sat, Jun 13, 2009 at 3:27 AM, Rick Monteverde<r...@highsurf.com> wrote: > Dunno, I forget. I seem to remember something about burning aluminum, even. > I think there's quite a few things out there that aren't practical because > they take too much energy to make. That's why they haven't been explored. > > -Rick > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: itsat...@gmail.com [mailto:itsat...@gmail.com] On >> Behalf Of Alexander Hollins >> Sent: Friday, June 12, 2009 4:33 PM >> To: vortex-l@eskimo.com >> Subject: Re: [Vo]:When two wrongs make a right >> >> The problem is just that , conversion efficiency. The more >> conversions you make, the more entropy in teh system, the >> more energy lost. >> >> What are you going to "make" other than electricity? We have >> internal combustion motors, and we have electical motors. >> so, if not electricity, then some new burnable fuel? made how? >> > >
