OK, I put the latest versions here
http://djk.se/The%20adiabatic%20heat%20gradient%20for%20solids%20and%20the%20heat%20conduction%20through%20the%20earth%20crust.pdf

Tell me what you think. The correspondence was remarkably high, especially
since I only have one figures precisions in two of the constants used.

David

David Jonsson, Sweden, phone callto:+46703000370

On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 9:15 PM, David Jonsson <[email protected]
> wrote:

> Wait with reading this. I found some minor errors. I will repost later.
> Maybe i put this on ArXiv, what do you say?
>
> David
>
> David Jonsson, Sweden, phone callto:+46703000370
>
> On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 8:26 PM, David Jonsson <
> [email protected]> wrote:
>
>> Here I show that there is no heat production in the earth interior. If you
>> build power plants to extract the heat you basically shrink the globe. You
>> only use potential energy or elastic energy.
>>
>> The calculation also nullifies a source of global heating. The heat flow
>> through the earth crust was assumed to be around twice the human energy
>> consumption ( 
>> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Geothermal_(geology)#Heat_flow<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Geothermal_%28geology%29#Heat_flow>).
>>
>> David
>>
>> David Jonsson, Sweden, phone callto:+46703000370
>>
>> On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 7:21 PM, Nick Palmer <[email protected]>wrote:
>>
>>> Re: the extra heat into the environment if we use deep geothermal wells.
>>>
>>> I wrote the following in my "Cold Fusion - an environmentalist's
>>> perspective" article for Infinite Energy magazine.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> "The human population is forecast to stabilise at around 11 billion by
>>> the middle of the next century and if each human was then using a constant
>>> 30 kilowatts, which may very well happen if we have unlimited energy to run
>>> our homes, transport and manufacturing processes etc, then we would be
>>> adding around an extra 1/750 of the heat that Earth intercepts from the sun.
>>> This might be insignificant globally but, as the climate seems to have a
>>> fractal nature and be vulnerable to the "butterfly effect", it may
>>> conversely have large effects. Fractional changes in the solar insolation
>>> due to tiny variations in Earth's orbit are thought to account for the
>>> periodicity of ice ages. In any event, the outpouring of so much waste heat
>>> in areas of high population density would certainly have an effect on the
>>> local microclimate and so this effect should be guarded against - it may be
>>> that we will need to radiate the waste heat into the night sky to get rid of
>>> it."
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> If geothermal proved to be a problem, I think it would be easily soluble.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Nick Palmer
>>>
>>> On the side of the Planet - and the people - because they're worth it
>>>
>>
>>
>

Reply via email to