On Sun, Jun 28, 2009 at 2:31 PM, Horace Heffner <[email protected]>wrote: > > Sure, I have a view. If you feel the idea has merit I think you should > more fully write up your idea, add any diagrams that might be relevant, and > include any formulas or computations you think are relevant, and post it on > your web site for posterity. Better yet would be to publish. >
I have no site, and no interest in publishing. I do have an interest in discussion. Not to mention since the idea is already presented with diagrams and math and a claimed replication by this "nayado" then any claims I make a decade after his website appeared will be redundant and appear I am trying to take credit for an idea that wasn't mine. (there may be a record pre-dating his site on vort but who cares) > > I don't see how any of the material of yours you reference (assuming it is > the material you last posted in this thread) is relevant to the "vortex > balls" thread > Only to the point that understanding either involves appreciating the fact that magnetic fields are somewhat relative. I'll start a new thread on it in a day or 2 with the improvements you suggest. > , or why I should be singled out to comment. > Simply because I know you know enough to do so, or so I believe, it's a compliment.
