Stephen A. Lawrence wrote:
But also see note at end:> These > examples are fact specific and should _not_ be applied as a /per se/ > rule.
Ah, but in fact they do apply this.
I don't see any other way to interpret '... should not be applied as a per se rule ...'.
I would interpret that as window dressing. It is something they can point to, when they wish to defray criticism and perhaps lawsuits.
I did note these sentences, but I discount them. - Jed
