Jed Rothwell wrote: > Stephen A. Lawrence wrote: > >> But also see note at end: >> >> > These >> > examples are fact specific and should _not_ be applied as a /per se/ >> > rule. > > Ah, but in fact they do apply this. > > >> I don't see any other way to interpret '... should not be applied as a >> per se rule ...'. > > I would interpret that as window dressing. It is something they can > point to, when they wish to defray criticism and perhaps lawsuits. > > I did note these sentences, but I discount them.
Sigh ... That's too bad.
