Steven,
Been briefly auditing when work allows but this is a quickie...
I believe time speeds up from our perspective accounting for the amount
of catalytic action that occurs (if relativistic then reactants are
unaware of the acceleration and actually put in all those extra hours
from their perspective) - and in response to a previous comment, the
reason I kept using the term event horizon as a reference instead of
approaching the speed of light was to establish equivalence at both ends
of the spectrum as the cavity and observer remain spatially stationary
to each other the delta in acceleration must be through equivalence
also. I believe the sea of vacuum flux permeate or "pressure" matter at
slightly different rates that is multiplied in a Casimir cavity, This
differential then creates an equivalent acceleration perpendicular to
space allowing two objects spatially stationary to other to have
different temporal accelerations (just read Puthoffs' "Everything from
Nothing" from list Horace sent me, I think I am using the term
"pressure" in the same way he did)
Fran
-----Original Message-----
From: Stephen A. Lawrence [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Friday, July 24, 2009 2:17 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Hydrino represents Lorentz contraction in the opposite
direction from event horizon
Stephen A. Lawrence wrote:
>
> Jones Beene wrote:
>
>> However, getting a massive charged particle to transverse a Casimir
gap
>> would be difficult
>
> Akshully .... How about, forget the "massive" bit, just substitute
> tritium oxide for deuterium oxide and load any-old-material with
Casimir
> sized pores with it, and see if the decay rate drops.
Or rises.
I'm still not clear on whether Frank is proposing time slows down or
speeds up in the gap.
>
> Dunno if it would be sensitive enough, but in principle it seems like
it
> would be simple and clear evidence one way or the other.
>
