A team at Cornell University has now filled in an important blank by pinpointing unique sites where the reactions take place on SWCNTs. The scientists showed that the reactions do not occur all along the tubes, but at the ends of the tubes or at defects along the tubes. http://www.nanowerk.com/spotlight/spotid=10185.php .
I suggest this applies equally to all Casimir cavities in that catalytic action will only occur when the distance between the plates changes. A change in fractional quantum states is proposed by both Mills from the perspective of catalysts and by Haisch -Moddel from the perspective of Casimir cavities. The lattice structures of metal catalysts and the cavity sizes of skeletal catalysts appear to fit the geometry defining Casimir cavities so I have been proposing that the two terms define the same animal and their property sets should be combined. Catalysts cause an increase in the number of reactions per unit time while Casimir cavities cause an atom to transform to fractional quantum states, Here Mills has already accomplished half the task by proposing a fractional state caused by a catalyst and I am suggesting that we do likewise and apply the catalyst property of accelerating reactions per unit time to the Casimir cavity. I don't even know for sure if this is challenged and may be stating the obvious but I would like to build on this without being accused of piling up multiple assumptions. if the above is accepted then it provides support for a relativistic solution to the hydrino. The twin travelling near C would perceive his brother and all physical properties on earth as rapidly accelerated. Additionally Lorentz contraction causes the observed object to appear smaller. The hydrino meets this criteria of increased reactions rate and contraction. The argument then becomes whether a Casimir cavity can create an equivalence similar to an event horizon using only the default value of equivalent acceleration outside a cavity VS the value created by shielding. The requirement would be to somehow slow the rate from the default value inside the cavity because we know that increasing the rate in an event horizon causes a slowing time dilation. I am proposing that the change in ratio of short to long vacuum fluctuations which defines a Casimir cavity is evidence for this difference in equivalent acceleration. Regards Fran
