2009/9/6 Abd ul-Rahman Lomax <[email protected]>: > Krivit's Galileo Project and Kowalski's Curie Project were great, as far as > they went (and Kowalski is poised to announce results this month), but this > will make it all easier. Kowalski reports communications that indicate there > could be a ready market for kits, both among serious researchers (not what I > had in mind at first) and high school -- or even younger (my original idea). > Baselines.
I agree that a kit would be great, but what experiment is best? Remembering that the Earthtech people had been questioning the nuclear particle origin of the pits in the CR-39 detectors in these SPAWAR type experiments, I Googled for: earthtech spawar and found their report on the subject here: http://www.earthtech.org/CR39/index.html where I saw they had discovered surprisinh things I was totally unaware of, notably that the SPAWAR pits can be obtained by codepositing cathode materials which you wouldn't expect to promote LENR, such as Cu, and also that the pits can be obtained in only 3 days (vs 11 days for the Galileo Project protocol) with the right protocol. So, nuclear, not nuclear? Michel
