Additional thought, the protective film itself could also be made of
CR-39 (which could be of the same batch, milled down to a few microns
thickness), this would guarantee that the cathode lies on exactly the
same substrate as in a non-PACA experiment.

Michel

2009/9/10 Michel Jullian <[email protected]>:
> 2009/9/10 Abd ul-Rahman Lomax <[email protected]>:
>> At 03:45 PM 9/9/2009, you [Jed] wrote:
>
>>> Ah. CR-39 is opaque. You mean looking around it, from another angle.
>>
>> No. There are different kinds of CR-39. It's true, I've never seen a CR-39
>> chip as used in this field, personally,
>
> See in top photograph here
> http://www.earthtech.org/CR39/A_B/reportAB.html  the cathode wire
> bearing part with a "1" and an "A" scratched in it. Doesn't look very
> opaque to me, at least not in the visible spectrum (Jed, can you
> provide refs showing opaque CR-39 used in this field?)
>
> Suggestion, if you want to video the cathode, better look at it from
> the side, I gather deposits can form on the bottom. Videoing through
> the CR-39 seems a good idea to me, if nothing else it will show how
> the plating, dendritic or spongy, forms vs time (hard dendritic
> plating is a requirement for pit forming it seems).
>
> You could drill a round window through the flat side wall of the cell,
> and press the cathode bearing CR-39 against the wall via e.g. a PTFE
> gasket around the hole to prevent leaks. Note such an arrangement also
> allows "PACA" experiments by interposing a few microns mylar film,
> plus, I suggest, a thin layer of air guaranteeing no electrolyte vs
> CR-39 chemical interaction whatsoever while only negligibly slowing
> down energetic particles.
>
> Michel
>

Reply via email to