?What do *Star in a Jar/Sonofusion/SonoCavitativeFusion,* & Shrimp, Diesels, &
Griggs have in common? Looking for the 'right' questions.
Frank Roarty: Posted the reference to 'Fractional Quantum States for Hydrogen
within Casimir Cavitation;' more or less. Minds across the globe are noticing
that there is 'something' maybe extremely important here that we need to
collectively focus upon in the sense of much discipline, cooperation, &
strenuous vigor. This is commanding more than an officianado's banal & fickle
interest on our parts.
And since we don't have the Nazi's at present goading us as with the Manhattan
Project we heartily needs to be taking the initiative of this work onto
ourselves in concert & with much zeal and vigor. After all, OU is the central
motivational premise of Vortex's existence. And in Vortex lies the potential
to ignite a greater fire within the Global Scientific Collective. This of
course is a noble & poetic view but not without basis in fact in each an every
one of your hearts & minds. Oh yea; the 'hearts & minds' bit again---yadda
yadda.
As an oblique reference to the above, it seems that we've barely scratched the
surface here to what will likely be the next quantum leap towards achieving
controlled fractional fusion.
Mostly I'm just forwarding further questions here. But like James Cromwell of
'Babe' & 'The Babe'(same year go fiqure) said while in holographic form in 'I
robot,' "Now 'that' is the right question;" I'm searching for the 'right'
questions.
We have been taught rigorously to take many things as 'givens' and thusly for
granted. Since I, for instance like 'finny-fish' I made the erroneous (and
unproven) assumption that I was 'all-good' with sea food across the board and
never questioned deeply my unconcious-intuitive & anomalous life-time avoidance
of 'shell-fish from the sea.' Oops-oh, a day ago that unquestioned
'assumption' nearly dispatched me from this mortal-coil. It had never occurred
to me to ask that critical 'right question.'
Water doesn't burn, everybody 'knows' that. Enter the pistol shrimp. Enter the
Giggs quasi-OU cyclic-multi cavitation cylinder. Enter 'Star in a Jar'
?Sono-Fusion/Sono-cavitative fusion?
Developing questions: ?Star in a Jar/Sono-fusion? & Pistol shrimp Cavitative
Compression fusion: ?Are these Compression hydrolysis & ignition being
catalytically piggy-backed/triggering also micro-fusion because the
'compression-hydrolysis is yielding 'both' H2-O2 molecular & also atomic H-H-O?
Rather than either/or; we may be seeing that hyper compression to the
accoustic centre of the highly compressed cavitation-cavity chamber is
performing the above simultaneously.
Focused energy yield-inputs tend to 'loosen' molecular bonds chemically & also
in variance also induced-foculized high-energy inputs such as fired neutrons
can also loosen atomic bonds. Resultantly then we have new chemical &/or
atomic configurations formed with high-residual-energy yield much of the time.
This is a given. Now more recently the 'Star in a Jar' experiment purports to
tentatively be performing this same
high-energy-input-to-cavity-centre-quasi-fusion function as the Pistol-shrimp
may be doing mechanically. But instead *Star in a Jar* is purported
accomplishing this function via Sonic wave input a-la' a variable/adjustable
wave transducer energy inputs upon a globe of water. This is theoretcally
causing the hydrolysis-chemical & quasi-hydrolysis-atomic cavitative
'chemically-fired-quasi-fusion' reaction via said Sono-acoustic inputs to
'converge harmonically' at said centre of the water/glass globe causing the
reaction to occur/fire.
Using terms like harmonic wave induction etc. starts to smack of Nikola Tesla.
Now there is a question worth contemplating and testing more in depth.
I'm still thinking that we'll be needing to see some Helium bubbles via
spectrographic analysis here.
The Star-in-a-Jar quasi-Sona-fusion device purports to create a
'Sun-temperature-Star Centre' in the centre of the water globe,' via Sonic
imputs. The parallels of Sonofusion to the Pistol-shrimp cavitatitive
hyper-reaction are interesting.
*But a big deal here with the Pistol shrimp is that we've ignored that he fires
his claw in a saline-hydrous solute medium. Sodium & Chloride ions in water
solute are highly conductive of Quantum-electron energy. Hense a saline
solution is going hold a much higher ambient charge than pure H2O which is
common knowledge. I'll add an image supposition that indeed 'ions' carry X-tra
charge and act as 'capacitors.' Hense with the Pistol shrimp the saline ion's
energy-release upon the 'eye-position-central-cavitative-hyper-compression's'
action acts further 'catalytically/aka accelerated hydrolysis.' And thusly our
ion-micro capacitors release their X-tra charge into this centrally focused
explosive mixture boosting, likely exponentially, this entire hydrolytic
process even to the point of also 'cracking' some of the molecular hydrogen
into atomic form. Thus is supplied fusable Hydrogen into the mix; and if
again, this is piggy-back micro-fusion the implications are indeed enormous.
It's hard to know if the Griggs device is paralleling the above hypothesis
since we can't clearly 'see' what is going on. But again, trace-Helium in the
steam vapor output of Griggs would be telling.
Funny thing and right before our eyes all along. This principle of
hyper-cavitative compression-hydrolysis/ignition/microfusion could at least be
'part' of the answer already and within our very grasp as we speak.
Basic internal combustion engines have been capitalizing on this
hypercavitation deal that seems to mightly accelerate 'chemical-reactive
explosions.' And maybe there has always been 'more quantum-physics' involved
here than it ever occurred to us to question. We took a merely prozaic
chemical internal-combustion reaction for granted because the machine 'simply
worked;' and worked quite well. Why look further; and if it's not 'baroque'
don't fix it; right?
Amusing premise in a question: Take a brand new extremely well engineered
high(cavitative)compression diesel engine. You'd want to get it right off of
the assembly line before it had been tainted with any petroleum product. If
you can use all synthetic crank-case lubricant & the more 'inert' then, more's
the better. This machine is fuel injection; (and remember that
increased-power-output-aircraft-piston-engines are water injected.) So using
the fuel injection system of the diesel engine to facilitate hydrous-saline
solute instead of '#2-diesel-fuel aka jet fuel' would likely merely need the
modification of the nozzles of the fuel injectors at the cylinders.
A good diesel engineer could facilitate the modifications for using salt-water
as fuel instead of diesel if any are necessary.
? ? ? And just suppose, that adding a more powerful high-speed/high-torque
initial starting system applied to the salt-water modified diesel engine became
a Pistol-shrimp firing sharply in every cylinder. And in short; we'd have a
conventional diesel engine that runs on salt-water with a steam exhaust with
maybe trace helium to-boot? Of course this is silliness because everybody
knows that salt-water doesn't burn nor explode; everybody, that is, except for
the Pistol shrimp; who like the bumble-bee, refuses rudely to comply with our
well established & mathmatically articulated preconceived 'givens;' &
fortunately for us it is. . . JO
_________________________________________________________________
Drag n’ drop—Get easy photo sharing with Windows Live™ Photos.
http://www.microsoft.com/windows/windowslive/products/photos.aspx
