Hey Frank: Point well taken and I don't dispute your theory relative to
'Casimir.' Especially in respect to the 'exponential acceleration' relative to
'temporal displacement of atomic hydrogen within the 'Casimir-cavity.' You are
likely perfectly correct regarding that high-energy state 'funding' the
sustaining of monatomic states resisting molecular re-configuration. In short;
in regards to 'Casimir' I think that you have pretty well nailed it.
But to my fault for making far too 'general of a comparison to 'Casimir'--: I
should have been more clear that I was speaking of the 'parallels' of Casimir
in a far too general sense to more 'macro' cavitative affects that I still
suspect may be miro-fusion fractionally and definitely hydrolysis-chemistry
possibly primarily; and both in rapid sequence with likely the 'chemical'
firing end catalytic to the fusion end; and the whole deal within catalytic
presence of high-charge sodium/chloride ions. And this is relative to these
larger macro-cavitation issues relative to Pistolshrimp, Griggs & Star in a
Jar. Sorry for my 'garbling' my apples & oranges reference.
So you are obviously correct that the Macro-Cavitative reactions that I am
speaking of are not really directly parallel to the 'Casimir Cavity'
phenomenon. I would tend to use 'Casimir's Trans-temporal displacement
relative to the exponential accelerative aspect' to quasi-prove some of my more
exotic theory, but that's another issue and fundamentally extraneous to this
larger pragmatum of the Pistolshrimp-Griggs issue of tapping large-energy
rather crudely and thusly turning it into large EM-Mechanical force.
Years ago a friend says to me, "?What think you of perpetual motion/OU?" I
flippantly said, "Oh, that's pretty easy because even the very concept of
'still, stop, or stasis' is a totally illusory master-fiction.--All that there
is to infinity is in a state of dynamic perpetual motion, perpetual process, &
perpetual change." Since then I've had to put 'my money where my mouth is; tsk
tsk; easier said than done.
OU may seem somewhat of a paradox according to the Conservation of Energy laws,
but the easy key is simply tapping the Larger & Unseen Master sources of energy
& hense Feyman's ZPE general conceptual premise bears fruit; more or less. At
whatever energy state or limitations that we merely seem to perceive; the easy
answer is that 'every atomic, subatomic, interstellar, galactic, & cosmic
astronomical energy construct and/or body that we detect is merely the 'lowest
end of the energy density & energy speed spectrum.'
Again; all that we merely think we know to be 'empirically everything' is
merely an extremely tiny/fractional Low-End of the entire Super-Cosmic energy
spectrum. The existence of dark energy, singularities &/or as galactic hubs
universally, & all matter racing/accelerating to the 'outfield' of the universe
perpetually, & Spooky Action at a Distance, are independently & corporately
merely our initial discoveries into the manifest obviousness of the
infintesimally low-end energy status of our entire know universe. But therie's
huge hope in Casimir/ZPE synthesis.
And those observations that you have accurately assessed relative to 'Casimir'
do exactly tend to confirm this.
There's no free lunch and we will never magically get something for nothing
relative to OU. It just ain't happening? But we can indeed tap that greater
reservoir of the latent hyper fluidic dimension of super speed & super density
energy states.
And with Casimir, whenever you see transtemporal/transdimensional 'shift'
relative to high-energy/high-speed states you are bumping hard against the
'cross-over' point in tapping that hyper-energy source dimension of which I oft
refer.
And the bottom line is this: Spooky Action at a Distance is the very
irrefutable evidence that our universe is but the low-end of the energy
spectrum. But the really big deal is that this proves beyond doubt that it is
a sub-atomic pathway that will give us functional access to the SuperCosmos
high end of the spectrum. Cern/Hadron/Fermi is trying to do it; but the real
solution lies in 'Casimir.'
And ultimately it is your work as regards Casimir that stands the very best
chance of functionally tapping the vastly larger/large end of the energy
spectrum; and this 'transdimensionally.'
Here's a tip; when you do it nobody will be hemming nor hawing that you merely
'seem' to be reporting relatively miniscule increases of caloric output or
whatever. You & the world will be watching a 'miracle of science' that will
parallel the first detonated fission bomb via Alamogorda @ Los Alamos-NM. But
this time it will be to the energy relief of the entire planet and not to the
destruction of a couple of Japanese cities and as well the subsequent
destruction of the peace of mind and future retardation of the social &
scientific progress of an entire planet. Happy hunting & Regards/JO
From: [email protected]
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE: [Vo]:*STAR*in*JAR*&ShrimpDieselsGriggs
Date: Sat, 12 Sep 2009 20:27:57 -0400
Hi Jack,
I won’t repeat my whole blog but in simpler terms I don’t think
this is fusion or chemistry. I suspect they are using a monatomic membrane to
break relativistic H2. The cavity is doing the work by creating a partial
boundary to vacuum fluctuations which effects the gravitational field flowing
through the cavity vs the gravitational field outside the cavity (As Zottia’s
paper proposes the isotropy is broken) creating a differential acceleration.
This differential is a tiny 10E-14 according to Di Fiore et all but is a
constant acceleration accumulating velocity exponentially. I suspect that
spatial confinement allows heat from disassociation and gas law to also
contribute to the acceleration vector. It is this velocity that opposes
relativistic H2 formation and immediately breaks the bonds, restores monatomic
energy levels and allows the atoms to continue accelerating. What Mills has
mistaken for “small hydrogen” with a fractional orbital may actually be
“distant hydrogen” with a normal orbital but the time coordinate diverging
while the spatial coordinates remain relatively stationary inside the cavity.
Likewise I think the up conversion of vacuum fluctuations inside a Casimir
cavity is actually due to this same acceleration and temporal divergence of the
original vacuum fluctuations which only appear smaller and faster from our
perspective see animation. Another animation from a relativistic perspective of
hydrogen inside the cavity.
Best Regards
Fran
From: Jack O Suileabhain [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Saturday, September 12, 2009 12:27 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: [Vo]:*STAR*in*JAR*&ShrimpDieselsGriggs
?What do *Star in a Jar/Sonofusion/SonoCavitativeFusion,* & Shrimp, Diesels, &
Griggs have in common? Looking for the 'right' questions.
Frank Roarty: Posted the reference to 'Fractional Quantum States for Hydrogen
within Casimir Cavitation;' more or less. Minds across the globe are noticing
that there is 'something' maybe extremely important here that we need to
collectively focus upon in the sense of much discipline, cooperation, &
strenuous vigor. This is commanding more than an officianado's banal & fickle
interest on our parts.
And since we don't have the Nazi's at present goading us as with the Manhattan
Project we heartily needs to be taking the initiative of this work onto
ourselves in concert & with much zeal and vigor. After all, OU is the central
motivational premise of Vortex's existence. And in Vortex lies the potential
to ignite a greater fire within the Global Scientific Collective. This of
course is a noble & poetic view but not without basis in fact in each an every
one of your hearts & minds. Oh yea; the 'hearts & minds' bit again---yadda
yadda.
As an oblique reference to the above, it seems that we've barely scratched the
surface here to what will likely be the next quantum leap towards achieving
controlled fractional fusion.
Mostly I'm just forwarding further questions here. But like James Cromwell of
'Babe' & 'The Babe'(same year go fiqure) said while in holographic form in 'I
robot,' "Now 'that' is the right question;" I'm searching for the 'right'
questions.
We have been taught rigorously to take many things as 'givens' and thusly for
granted. Since I, for instance like 'finny-fish' I made the erroneous (and
unproven) assumption that I was 'all-good' with sea food across the board and
never questioned deeply my unconcious-intuitive & anomalous life-time avoidance
of 'shell-fish from the sea.' Oops-oh, a day ago that unquestioned
'assumption' nearly dispatched me from this mortal-coil. It had never occurred
to me to ask that critical 'right question.'
Water doesn't burn, everybody 'knows' that. Enter the pistol shrimp. Enter the
Giggs quasi-OU cyclic-multi cavitation cylinder. Enter 'Star in a Jar'
?Sono-Fusion/Sono-cavitative fusion?
Developing questions: ?Star in a Jar/Sono-fusion? & Pistol shrimp Cavitative
Compression fusion: ?Are these Compression hydrolysis & ignition being
catalytically piggy-backed/triggering also micro-fusion because the
'compression-hydrolysis is yielding 'both' H2-O2 molecular & also atomic H-H-O?
Rather than either/or; we may be seeing that hyper compression to the
accoustic centre of the highly compressed cavitation-cavity chamber is
performing the above simultaneously.
Focused energy yield-inputs tend to 'loosen' molecular bonds chemically & also
in variance also induced-foculized high-energy inputs such as fired neutrons
can also loosen atomic bonds. Resultantly then we have new chemical &/or
atomic configurations formed with high-residual-energy yield much of the time.
This is a given. Now more recently the 'Star in a Jar' experiment purports to
tentatively be performing this same
high-energy-input-to-cavity-centre-quasi-fusion function as the Pistol-shrimp
may be doing mechanically. But instead *Star in a Jar* is purported
accomplishing this function via Sonic wave input a-la' a variable/adjustable
wave transducer energy inputs upon a globe of water. This is theoretcally
causing the hydrolysis-chemical & quasi-hydrolysis-atomic cavitative
'chemically-fired-quasi-fusion' reaction via said Sono-acoustic inputs to
'converge harmonically' at said centre of the water/glass globe causing the
reaction to occur/fire.
Using terms like harmonic wave induction etc. starts to smack of Nikola Tesla.
Now there is a question worth contemplating and testing more in depth.
I'm still thinking that we'll be needing to see some Helium bubbles via
spectrographic analysis here.
The Star-in-a-Jar quasi-Sona-fusion device purports to create a
'Sun-temperature-Star Centre' in the centre of the water globe,' via Sonic
imputs. The parallels of Sonofusion to the Pistol-shrimp cavitatitive
hyper-reaction are interesting.
*But a big deal here with the Pistol shrimp is that we've ignored that he fires
his claw in a saline-hydrous solute medium. Sodium & Chloride ions in water
solute are highly conductive of Quantum-electron energy. Hense a saline
solution is going hold a much higher ambient charge than pure H2O which is
common knowledge. I'll add an image supposition that indeed 'ions' carry X-tra
charge and act as 'capacitors.' Hense with the Pistol shrimp the saline ion's
energy-release upon the 'eye-position-central-cavitative-hyper-compression's'
action acts further 'catalytically/aka accelerated hydrolysis.' And thusly our
ion-micro capacitors release their X-tra charge into this centrally focused
explosive mixture boosting, likely exponentially, this entire hydrolytic
process even to the point of also 'cracking' some of the molecular hydrogen
into atomic form. Thus is supplied fusable Hydrogen into the mix; and if
again, this is piggy-back micro-fusion the implications are indeed enormous.
It's hard to know if the Griggs device is paralleling the above hypothesis
since we can't clearly 'see' what is going on. But again, trace-Helium in the
steam vapor output of Griggs would be telling.
Funny thing and right before our eyes all along. This principle of
hyper-cavitative compression-hydrolysis/ignition/microfusion could at least be
'part' of the answer already and within our very grasp as we speak.
Basic internal combustion engines have been capitalizing on this
hypercavitation deal that seems to mightly accelerate 'chemical-reactive
explosions.' And maybe there has always been 'more quantum-physics' involved
here than it ever occurred to us to question. We took a merely prozaic
chemical internal-combustion reaction for granted because the machine 'simply
worked;' and worked quite well. Why look further; and if it's not 'baroque'
don't fix it; right?
Amusing premise in a question: Take a brand new extremely well engineered
high(cavitative)compression diesel engine. You'd want to get it right off of
the assembly line before it had been tainted with any petroleum product. If
you can use all synthetic crank-case lubricant & the more 'inert' then, more's
the better. This machine is fuel injection; (and remember that
increased-power-output-aircraft-piston-engines are water injected.) So using
the fuel injection system of the diesel engine to facilitate hydrous-saline
solute instead of '#2-diesel-fuel aka jet fuel' would likely merely need the
modification of the nozzles of the fuel injectors at the cylinders.
A good diesel engineer could facilitate the modifications for using salt-water
as fuel instead of diesel if any are necessary.
? ? ? And just suppose, that adding a more powerful high-speed/high-torque
initial starting system applied to the salt-water modified diesel engine became
a Pistol-shrimp firing sharply in every cylinder. And in short; we'd have a
conventional diesel engine that runs on salt-water with a steam exhaust with
maybe trace helium to-boot? Of course this is silliness because everybody
knows that salt-water doesn't burn nor explode; everybody, that is, except for
the Pistol shrimp; who like the bumble-bee, refuses rudely to comply with our
well established & mathmatically articulated preconceived 'givens;' &
fortunately for us it is. . . JO
_________________________________________________________________
Share your memories online with anyone you want.
http://www.microsoft.com/middleeast/windows/windowslive/products/photos-share.aspx?tab=1
