I have a heartfelt request, has nothing to do with science or energy, just to do with posting practices.
[email protected] wrote: > At 07:03 PM 9/19/2009, you wrote: PLEASE, if you can, change your email program to put in the name of the poster, rather than "you"! There are something like 50 or 100 regular posters on this list and they all are named "you". Consequently I sometimes find it very hard to tell who you is. Sometimes the threading makes it obvious; other times it doesn't. In this particular case I have no idea who you might be. If you could say who you was in this case, and call you something more specific in the future, I'd appreciate it. Thanks. > You forgot the early SPAWAR claims of tritium by codep, that's > inexpensive isn't it? But again, doesn't the fact that they are now > trying other LENR detection techniques, necessarily less convincing > than tritium, suggest they have since found a mundane explanation for > the apparent tritium increase? > > I wouldn't even suspect that. > > If they reported tritium, and later found a mundane explanation, not to > report that would be unethical, I'd say. > > Hang the consequences, tell the truth, disclose what you know. > > For science, anyway. Girlfriend asks if she looks fat, and if she does, > lie. Quickly and sincerely. "You look beautiful!" > > "Okay, but do I look fat?" > > "Of course not!" (How could I even tell, being so blinded by your beauty!) > >
