2009/9/23, [email protected] <[email protected]>: > At 07:03 PM 9/19/2009, you wrote: > You forgot the early SPAWAR claims of tritium by codep, that's > inexpensive isn't it? But again, doesn't the fact that they are now > trying other LENR detection techniques, necessarily less convincing > than tritium, suggest they have since found a mundane explanation for > the apparent tritium increase? > > I wouldn't even suspect that. > > If they reported tritium, and later found a mundane explanation, not > to report that would be unethical, I'd say. > > Hang the consequences, tell the truth, disclose what you know.
Then why bother with CR-39 and cameras for the cfp kit, let's just look for tritium, that's totally unambiguous and it makes the kit cheaper. Michel (aka "you")
