[email protected] wrote: My published paper, The Control of the Natural Forces is out in this September's edition of Infinite Energy. I am working on another paper, "The Duality of Matter and Waves"
Linked below http://www.angelfire.com/scifi2/zpt/temp/MatterWaves.pdf Mauro Lacy wrote: I suggest you abandon the "particle paradigm" completely, and concentrate on the "extended wave paradigm" ... ----------- Hi All, 9-23-09 You might be interested in the following from the Cycles Group. Jack Smith ------------- ``Re: Annual cycle and the eclipse tomorrow night Posted by: "Ray Tomes" [email protected] rjtomes Date: Mon Jan 26, 2009 6:34 pm ((PST)) Commentator 1 wrote: Here is the data from the Purdue group working at Brookhaven, in which they show a correlation between the radioactive decay rate and distance to the Sun. To get the required precision, they calibrated new samples of a short lived nuclide against one with a long life. It is not clear which half life was more affected. In contrast, I am working with two medium lifetime nuclides, Cs-137 and Co-60. http://www.sciencenews.org/view/download/id/38404/name/GRAPH_2.jpg Feshbach and Jenkins: arxiv.org/abs/0808.3156 Ray Tomes wrote: This is very interesting stuff. The ideas of people who believe in WSM (wave structure of matter) are being supported by this sort of finding as we believe that matter is constantly reformed from incoming waves and so local conditions are important. I would note ... that the phase seems slightly off from sun's distance. So we can say there is an annual cycle, but it might be cosmic rays, gravitational potential or perhaps temperature or other environmental variable. The day is coming when physics will recognize that everything is a flux and that the standing wave nature of the universe means that the incoming waves that reform everything every moment do depend on external conditions in the cosmos. ... ultimately everything is waves in my view. That would include both standing waves (matter and structures) and travelling waves (light etc). Regards, Ray''
