?Does the concept of 'Helicoid Wave String Model for Photons & Electrons' seem 
familiar?  And does the 'spin-twist(rotation) of said 
(wavestring-ratherthan-particle as a model for said Photon &/or Electron 
wave-string) explanation for it's gravitation-effect sound familiar either?  
Just a thought -JO-
 
> Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2009 07:50:32 -0300
> From: [email protected]
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [Vo]:Writing another paper. the duality of matter and waves 
> 
> Hi Frank
> 
> Something along those lines. Your derivation of the elastic nature of
> the electron is a little bit confusing, but I think is the way to go.
> 
> I suggest you to abandon the "particle paradigm" completely, and
> concentrate on the "extended wave paradigm", i.e. pulsating strings,
> that is, elastic formulations. In that sense, you should be able to come
> up with an elastic formulation for the photon also. This could prove to
> be very fruitful. I'm thinking about this, and the photon seems to be a
> form of fully elongated string, when propagating on empty space. More
> about this later, probably.
> By the way, the "particle nature" of the photon arises as no more than
> the result of a discrete "packaging" or "train" of pulses(a quanta),
> produced during emission, and depending on the emission process.
> 
> We should be able to see all of the Universe as constituted by tiny
> vibrating(pulsating, actually, and also rotating) strings. Both
> macroscopic and elementary behavior should arise as a result of the
> action and interaction of these pulsating strings. Gravity included. And
> the strong and weak nuclear forces too.
> 
> In that regard, I suggest you to reflect on the origin of your
> previously derived elastic nature of the electron, i.e. the elastic
> nature (as a form of energy) as a manifestation of an interaction
> between the electron and the surrounding material environment.
> Particularly protons.
> 
> Finally, where you able to calculate the frequency or the period of this
> oscillation of the electron? I cannot make sense of your MHz-meter unit.
> I should probably read your published paper. Maybe you can post it here
> in a couple of weeks, or send me a copy.
> 
> And please forget about "control". That 'll come later.
> And don't forget to give credit where credit is due. In these modern
> times, and an Internet mailing list can be more stimulating and fruitful
> than a hundred of magazines or papers.
> 
> Mauro
> 
> [email protected] wrote:
> > My published paper, The Control of the Natural Forces is out in this
> > September's addition of Infinite Energy.
> > I am working on another paper, "The Duality of Matter and Waves"
> > 
> > Linked below
> > 
> > http://www.angelfire.com/scifi2/zpt/temp/MatterWaves.pdf
> > 
> > I invite comment.
> > 
> > 
> > Frank Znidarsic
> > 
> > fznidarsic at America on line dot com
> 
> 
                                          
_________________________________________________________________
Show them the way! Add maps and directions to your party invites. 
http://www.microsoft.com/windows/windowslive/products/events.aspx

Reply via email to