Harvey Norris wrote:
> --- On Sat, 9/26/09, Stephen A. Lawrence <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
>> From: Stephen A. Lawrence <[email protected]> Subject: Re: [Vo]:Car
>> Alternators Vs Old Style Generators To: [email protected] Date:
>> Saturday, September 26, 2009, 10:05 AM
>> 
>> 
>> Chris Zell wrote:
>>> The last car to use generators that I'm aware of was
>> the VW Bug.  I
>>> suppose alternators were cheaper to build.
> What a coincidence, I remember an incident where my (pre 70's?) Car
> Me Ghia? VW had its alternator go out, and was in fact surprised to
> learn it was instead a generator. Your post made me remember this. A
> freind has a porsche engine in the older VW busses they made.
>> That would make sense.  Once cheap reliable high current diodes
>> became available, the alternator design appears simpler.
>> 
>> On the other hand, I've always heard that alternators are preferred
>>  because they perform better than generators at low RPM -- in other
>>  words, their "power band" is wider, which is important for 
>> something which turns at a fixed rate relative to the engine (no 
>> transmission on the generator).  I've never checked that claim out,
>>  however.
> Because the (car) alternator has its field regulated, it is designed
> to constantly produce 12 or 13 volts, probably even at the lowest rpm
> available to it by idle of the automobile. The PMG site however
> claims that high amperage extraction at low rpms must be avoided as
> it will overheat the stator windings. The one I am purchasing will be
> used for a small Brown's gas torch; driven by a 10 hp lawnmower
> engine. What this means is that the generator that developes higher
> voltage at higher rpms will have a load that "kicks in" only after a
> certain rpm developes. This is to be negotiated by the number of
> cells in series that the unit employs. It would seem then that my
> variable speed drive will come in very handy here. As noted with 40
> cells in series, the thermoneutral electrolysis point only being 1.4
> volts/cell, this implies that the load should kick in at 56 volts
> from the generator, which is probably just under mid range engine rpm
> for an automotive application. HDN

This sounds like you actually want 56 or more volts from the beast, yes?

I seem to recall that you can dink the built-in regulator in a typical
automobile alternator and get out very high volts from it.  Where I read
this, exactly what you have to disable, or how high the volts can go
before the alternator does an auto de fey, I don't recall just now,
unfortunately.


>> Most of my experience with generators comes from the old flathead
>> Willys Jeep engines we used in my father's boat, back in the day.
>> (Two in succession; first replaced when the cylinder walls rusted 
>> through, due to use of an open cooling system in brackish water. 
>> It's a tradeoff -- a closed system is more expensive, more complex,
>> and takes more maintenance, but an open system requires replacing
>> the engine block every ten years or so.)
>> 
>> 
>>> 
>> 
> 

Reply via email to