Robin,
If you mean the basic reason you can't have a "real" sub ground state the kinetic energy argument is here http://www.phact.org/e/z/hydrino.htm E= -me^4/2h^2 OR The hydrino and other unlikely states by Norm Dombey http://arxiv.org/abs/physics/0608095 also argues the hydrino is non physical in 3 dimensions but ignores relativistic solutions -A point that is valid for the hydrino as defined by Mills but ignores Naudts suggestion that there is a relativistic solution. I'm not sure if I understand what you are seeking regarding math - as Bourgoins 2006 paper indicates you simply divide C by the quantum number to get the radial velocity for different fractional states which is what I am proposing are actually inertial frames and that the velocity is unchanged from the perspective of the atom itself inside the frame. Whether this seemingly "shrunken" atom can now fit between narrower plates is what I think you are alluding to and it is a question I have been considering for some time. I believe the nuclei and "almost free" orbitals in a mettalic lattice form a balance of concentrating longer wavelength vac flux and depletion zones where the narrow cavity acts like a starved resivoir that gets drawn down lower than the ambient field outside the cavity breaking the isotropy -this balance is normally resolved on the atomic level but in the case of Casimir materials can be accumulated with proper geometry. The "summing" of the plate surfaces to form the depletion zone has been examined by Liftshitz and other and is said to break down at the very local levels and I haven't yet done my homework to determine how close you can get but Horace and others have convinced me you really can't keep going smaller once you approach the subatomic structures in the plate area - This doesn't mean the field can't sum to allow the atom to "appear" 1/137 in size but does suggest the "sweet spot" may be displaced enough from the plate surfaces to allow summation. My basic premise is that these "fast" spinning atoms form fast spinning molecules that release a photon and then immediately feel confinement in the membrane like cavity in opposition to the inertia they brought with them when the covalent bond formed. Best Regards Fran BTW - I prefer the Phact.org argument as Norms work is over my head. ----- Original Message ----- From: [email protected] To: [email protected] Sent: Wednesday, October 28, 2009 2:43:37 AM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern Subject: Re: [Vo]:Nickel has unique physical properties In reply to [email protected]'s message of Wed, 28 Oct 2009 03:35:20 +0000 (UTC): Hi Fran, I note that you still haven't answered my question. :) BTW can you do the algebra, and come up with specific cavity sizes required, or better a formula to calculate the size that has as it's only variable the desired size/shrinkage level of the shrunken H? > > >Hi Robin, > > Thanks for the notice regarding my company email. I was thinking it was >vortex blocking me but then found all my missing posts were available on my >home account - > > > >I hate bashing Mills in my posts because he is so close -If Naudts/Bourgoin >had done their papers before Mills work it would have been clearer about the >relativistic nature of their math. Mills also had to approach it from >chemistry and catalytic action in the early 90's before "Cavity QED". I don't >think it is a coincidence that catalysts like Rayney nickel happen to have >casimir geometry - I predict that someone will soon prove casimir cavities are >the engine behind all catalytic action and that reactants are actually >accelerated through time dilation - the surface areas and oxidation properties >are related to the cavity geometry. If the only difference between Mills >theory and a relativistic interpretation were a true fractional quantum state >where the orbital wavelength somehow was a lower number of whole planklengths >VS "appearing" to have a lower number due to a relative perspective I would >drop the argument. The reason I keep beating this horse is because it changes >the nature >and complexity of what is going on inside the cavity. It isn't just a narrow >band of frequencies being upconverted but rather everything in that space time >"appears" upconverted. It doesn't require collisions to oscillate between >relativistic H1 and relativistic H2 but rather tears itself apart due to >accumulated radial velocity and the membrane like nature of the geometry >to fast moving diatomic particles. > > > >Best Regards > >Fran Regards, Robin van Spaandonk http://rvanspaa.freehostia.com/Project.html
